What's a Brinks 4000?

Oct 18, 2007 41 Replies
  1. Providing false testimony
  2. Claiming intellectual property rights on products they don't even manufacturer.
  3. Claiming ownership on a Arrowhead PGM670 programmer that was made before Brinks even started peddling alarms.
  4. There is no 4.
  5. Claiming ownership on programmers Honeywell holds copyrights on.
  6. Claiming that panels installed OEM in new homes still belong to Brinks.
  7. Claiming that Jim Rojas' Tech Help software contains Brinks intellectual property.
  8. Claiming that Jim Rojas does business regularly in Texas, even though a service call is only 900+ miles away.
  9. Threatening Jim Rojas webshosting company with legal action if they didn't shut him down immediately.

There's alot more...

Jim Rojas

Nomen Nescio wrote:

You're right, Sableman doesn't understand. He's a lawyer, not an alarm guy. All he knows is what Brink's tells him. Brink's is the one who's making stuff up. Get pissed at them.

Getting at the truth is what the discovery phase of litigation is all about. Both sides gather evidence, expose misconceptions or outright lies, and either come to an agreement or present their cases at trial for a judge or jury to decide. The lawyers do battle. If both sides could agree on everything within a couple of weeks, there wouldn't be any need for a lawsuit.

At this stage, it's normal for each side to believe the other guy is being an unreasonable bastard. The problem is, Jim doesn't have a lawyer, and hasn't followed the rules of litigation, and therefore he probably won't get the opportunity to expose the truth. That's a crying shame.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required