Here's a question regarding the NO NETWORK-CLOCK-PARTICIPATE command.
I have multiple T1s to multiple sites. All of them come back into a central 3840 router. Some links are timed via telco-provided clock (loop timing). Some links have no timing and thus have the CLOCK-SOURCE INTERNAL on that controller running, and on the distant end of that particular link, the controller is loop timed.
Now, the NO NETWORK-CLOCK-PARTICIPATE command, in which scenarios should this be used? As I understand it, the command causes the wic card to use its own timing, rather than the network. The positive form of the command means it will use the network for timing - which I take it that a site set up with the NETWORK-CLOCK-PARTICIPATE WIC 0 command should use the recovered timing signal (loop) from my central router which is participating with its own clock having been set up with NO NETWORK-CLOCK-PARTICIPATE command.
Looking at traffic pattern graphs, the ethernet traffic on the router mirrors the serial interface errors which is indicative of the clock on the that interface having sync issues.
My root question is, within a hub and spoke network, where all your sites are recovered timing and having the central site router providing timing via its internal clock, what should each site router and what should the central router be set to with relation to the NETWORK-CLOCK-PARTICIPATE command? My assumption is the sites should all me NETWORK-CLOCK-PARTICIPATE and the central router should have the negated form of the command.
-pooch