Hi there, First of all I'm from Switzerland. Therefore I'm pre-sorry for my bad english.
My Problem is the following: I'm trying to set up an Cisco 1231 AP (IOS 12.3). I configured (with the GUI) an SSID 'intern' associated with the VLAN 250. Now I got the two new virtual Interfaces Dot11radio0.250 and FastEthernet0.250. They are both in the 'bridge-group 250'. The physical interface 'Dot11radio0' itself is in the 'Bridge-group 1' as well as the physical interface FastEthernet0.
Now I configured these DHCP Scopes like that:
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.1.0.1 10.1.0.2 ip dhcp pool INTERN network 10.1.0.0 /28 lease 10
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.3 ip dhcp pool DEFAULT network 10.0.0.0 /28 lease 10
The following IP settings are set: Dot11radio0: no ip address Dot11radio0.250 : 10.1.0.1 /28 FastEthernet0: no ip address FastEthernet0.250: no ip address BVI 1: 10.0.0.2 /28
Now when I try to connect to the AP using the SSID 'intern', I get no IP-Address.
I even tried to configure a BVI 250 interface with the IP-Address
10.1.0.2 /28, it doesn't help. On the AP I turned on all 'debug ip dhcp server' stuff and I don't even see a DHCPDISCOVER. I also tried to abstract the Dot11radio0 interface from the bridge-group 1 which isn't allowed as the AP says.
Probably I don't understand the Bridge-group thing very well but isn't it inconsistent when the 'root' interface dot11radio0 is in bridge-group 1 and the sub-if dot11radio0.250 itself is in bridge-group
250?
I tried one more thing: I did exactly the same configuration (in the GUI) without assigning the SSID 'intern' to a VLAN. In that case I get an IP Address out of the DEFAULT Pool.