License? I ain't got to show you no stinkin' license. Was: Monitronicsmonitoring assigned to Apex

Apex Alarm / Monitronics:

"Apex Alarm LLC" of Orem Utah is a Monitronics Authorized Dealer. Apex Alarm LLC sells/installs Ademco Lynx systems during the summer months May-August. It routinely assigns its 36 month @ $~40.00/mo subscriber monitoring agreements to Monitronics International Inc of Dallas TX, which pays, we are informed, around $1,400 for each one.

When hearing that Monitronics re-assigned one of those agreements back to Apex Alarm LLC, I am thinking that it could be due to the unenforcibility of the agreement.

This could be due to the fact that Apex Alarm LLC, in Calif at least, is unlicensed (no burglar alarm license; and no fire alarm license), a condition the Calif Dept of Consumer Affairs and the Calif Contractors State License Board are investigating. Monitronics is aware of this no-license problem, too.

Also Apex Alarm LLC is not registered with the Calif Sec of State, a requirement for doing business in Calif.

Further, Apex Alarm LLC has been Sanctioned in Virginia for alarm license violations, and just recently cited in Utah for other license problems.

One wonders how that re-assigned system will actually be monitored.

Or perhaps it was due to the fact that an ADT system may have been replaced by Apex Alarm LLC (as opposed to an entirely new system installation), and because Monitronics apparently does not want to pay for takeover accounts.

Our reading of Calif law is that alarm monitoring agreements obtained by unlicensed alarm dealers are unenforcible in court (one wonders if the limitation of liability provisions are enforceable either). We believe that Monitronics may have acquired over 10,000 such California agreements from Apex Alarm LLC. Monitronics is aware of these problems as well.

Let's do the math: 10,000 x $1,400 = a significant number.

Norm Mugford wrote:

James......ADT did the same thing in this area a couple of years ago. > When the client calls, they try to get them to switch monitoring. > That in itself could violate your contract and cause harm to the > end user. Should be reported to the State agency that governs > alarms, etc. > > Norm Mugford
Reply to
Nick Lawrence
Loading thread data ...

Isn't or wasn't Apex Alarm a name that 911.com was using at one time?

Doug L

Reply to
Doug L

Hey, Mark Sounds like another opportunity for a "business" trip to CA. Bring your bike. js

Reply to
alarman

Wow, what a memory Doug. You are correct. Since 1966, 'Apex Alarm'TM is a service, and is a registered servicemark, of 911 Inc of Calif. Use of the name Apex Alarm in Calif by Apex Alarm LLC of Utah is infringement upon the Apex Alarm trademark, and is causing confusion in the marketplace as to the source of genuing 'Apex Alarm' services.

Reply to
Nick Lawrence

Not really, I did a google search and this popped up

formatting link
Doug L

Reply to
Doug L

Lol! I don't want to come out over that crap tho :)

Reply to
Mark Leuck

Nick, You ever get anywhere with that?

Crash

Reply to
Crash Gordon

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.