help configuring 2600, 1700 PtP T1 to business DSL

I will apologize in advance for not knowing more about what I am doing. I am trying to provide internet access to the director of our department who lives beyond the reaches of broadband. We have a 6Mb Business DSL circuit in our test lab that we wish to connect him to at home. We have a DS3 in our data center. We have purchased a point-to-point T1 from our DS3 to the director's house. This was installed last week.

Our DSL issued us 5 static IP addresses and a 4 port DSL modem which is doing no router functions, only modem and switch functions. Here is a link to what I would like to do. I am open to suggestions.

formatting link
We are going to hang the 2610 in our data center and the 1720 at his house. And yes, we are getting a sweet deal on the T1 because of the DS3, otherwise we would have forced him into satelite internet. I would like to have the 1720 do all routing, firewall, dhcp for his network and not need to add another home gateway type device to his network. We are simply using a switch and 2 Linksys wireless G APs to provide coverage in his house.

Reply to
bjriffel
Loading thread data ...

you will also need to configure NAT on 2600

Reply to
Merv

I found this similar config on another group. How much of this would I need for my 1720? Wouldn't I need to use NAT on the 1720 for the internal network there as well as setting up the scope?

no ip dhcp conflict logging ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.31 ! ip dhcp pool LOCAL network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 192.168.1.1 ! interface Ethernet0 description AT&T Broadband ip address dhcp ip nat outside half-duplex ! interface FastEthernet0 description Home LAN ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside speed auto ! ip nat inside source list 10 interface Ethernet0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Ethernet0 name Default ! access-list 10 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

Merv wrote:

Reply to
bjriffel

I do not think you would want to NAT on the 1700 because you would just being going from a 192.168.1.x address to a network 10 address because htat is what will be on the outside interface of the 1700.

You would end up double NAT which is probably not a good idea.

Reply to
Merv

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.