==============================
(pasting from another post)
I was about to spend $50 or more to replace our handset for our old Panasonic phone (
==============================
New thoughts:
I'm not sure we're happy with the sound quality of the new phones. I guess that I was so busy thinking about networking that I was hoping I could just take it easy on the phone decision, figuring that any new-ish phone with good Amazon reviews would be good enough.
Now that they're here, I'm starting to wonder. For example, our old phones were 5.8 GHz. The new ones are 1.9 GHz. Does a higher number of GHz mean better sound quality? I hadn't even considered that when I was purchasing. (In fact, if you had asked me, I would have reported that our old phones must be 2.4 GHz.)
I was just so happy to see that over 500 reviewers gave the phone an average rating of 4.5 stars that I figured I was done. I read up a bit, mostly comparing this phone to a model that was similar but "digital," and decided that I didn't know what digital would get me, and that I wanted 17 hours of talk time rather than 5 hours.
I didn't read up on whether the new phone had more than one voicemail box, or what exactly I was giving up by not going "digital," or whether the GHz was an indication of signal strength, or simply what frequency it broadcast on, etc.
Now that I've got the network set up, I'll probably see if there's a Panasonic that seems to stomp the one we bought, and consider doing an exchange.