I came across this post from January 1st of 2011, and I'm republishing it, since I'd like to see more discussion on this topic. John Levine answered Sam with some detail, and I'll add some more questions to John's original post, but VoIP remains a "Black Box" to me and so I'm seeking some more info.
I'd add a couple of questions to Sam's original:
- Why is Comcast's "VoIP" offering _so_ bad? It's got reserved bandwidth, a fatter pipe, and the advantage of a closed system that has known, well-documented interfaces at both ends. What went wrong?
- What did the "1995 Caller ID decision" involve? Was it ever resolved?
Bill Horne Moderator
----- Forwarded message from Sam Spade -----
To: snipped-for-privacy@> Thank you all for your support and help in 2010. I appreciate your
Happy New Year, Bill.
I would be especially eager to learn how Vonage really works. It's all a mystery to me. Sure, I undersand the transmission method, but I don't have a clue about how they "switch" calls and how they interface into the PSTN. I recall the suits where Verizon (I believe) seriously challenged Vonage for a time, based on Vonage's violation of Verizon patents, or something like that.
Clearing the air on Vonage and VoIP would be great.
Another interesting subject would be the history of how strong the FCC was in the 1995 Caller ID decision, then in subsequent years have seem to lost interest in maintaining the integrity of Caller ID delivery and they never did address the reserved PBX component of the original decision.
----- End forwarded message -----