Re: Connecticut's Suit Against Vonage is Less Than Baseless

formatting link

> 5/4/2005 > -Posted by Russell Shaw @ 4:05 pm > Connecticut is the latest state to sue Vonage for misrepresenting the > way in which the service handles "911" calls. > Seems to me that Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal > instructed his staff to obtain a copy of the Texas suit -- and after > doing so, did some CPR (cut, paste, rewrite). Then, they drafted the > current suit. > The Connecticut suit has less than no merit. No specific Vonage > customer in Connecticut seems to have suffered the trying consequences > of Vonage 911-connect failure like that customer in Houston may have. > And what about the fact that Connecticut filed the suit just about on > the eve of today's announcement that Vonage will work with Verizon > (the main local telco in Connecticut) to enable E911 solutions? Maybe > Blumenthal and his folks didn't bother to check. Or, maybe he and > his staffers were concerned that 911 solution progress is slower > between Vonage and SBC (which covers part of Connecticut) than it is > between Vonage and Verizon.

Actually Connecticut is SBC, not Verizon. That might have something to do with it.

Reply to
Tony P.
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.