New ADT Homeland Security Program

Thought you guys might like to know about this...

formatting link

Bush Announces New U.S. Security Initiative

U.S. Borders, Airports to Display "Secured by ADT" Security Signs Washington, DC ?

President Bush today announced new strategies to deter terrorists from entering the United States, including placing ?Secured by ADT? signs along U.S. borders. The country, however, will not actually be protected by an ADT security system, said Bush. ?We researched residential security, and found that the (ADT) signs alone are a deterrent to break-ins, even if the system is not installed.?

Democratic leader Tom Daschle decreed the ADT signs as a ?feeble? and ?shallow? attempt at improving national security. ?Without an actual (security) system installed, I fail to see how this will make our country a safer place. If President Bush were serious about improving national security, he would pony up the monthly fee and get (the ADT security system) installed.?

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer tackled the criticism at a press conference late yesterday afternoon. He cited statistics that show homes with security systems are 87% less likely to be burglarized. One study claims that homes with security system signs, but no actual security system, are still 68% safer than homes without signs. ?We can make this country a safer place, and do so without spending taxpayer dollars for an ADT system.?

Fleischer also cited the difficulties of having the system installed and maintained. ?The installation rarely goes smoothly, and there are usually a few false alarms in the first week following installation. Those are risks that we simply can not take.?

Other difficulties make it unlikely that the government will purchase the ADT system. Like all ADT customers, the United States would have to choose three friends to be on a ?call list?. The ADT monitoring center calls these ?friends? in case of a U.S. security breach. Selecting these three friends would be a political nightmare. ?We could choose Canada?, said Fleischer ?but really, what are they going to do for us if we are attacked? And I still don?t trust England.? Fleischer also added that it would be difficult to properly maintain a motion detector for the entire country. ?Given all of these potential difficulties, the president thinks the ADT signs will do just fine on their own.?

Normally ADT does not distribute their security signs unless a system is installed, said ADT spokesperson Cynthia Carter. The company is making an exception in this case, however. ?After the events of September 11th, all Americans are sacrificing for the better good of the country. It is in this spirit that ADT is donating 45,000 of our ?Secured by ADT? signs to the government for use at their discretion.?

The signs will be placed along borders and at airline gates where international flights land on U.S. soil, said Fleischer.

In return for the free signs, the ADT logo will be painted on the sides of Air Force One and will be sewn onto the sleeve of all of the president?s golf shirts.

Reply to
J.
Loading thread data ...

LOL... That would not surprise me...

Reply to
G. Morgan

Thats a rather old joke, Ari Fleischer hasn't been spokesman for 3 or 4 years now and Tom Daschle got beat in 2004

"J. @netscape.net>"

Reply to
Mark Leuck

I don't normally comment about other country's politics, but this has got to be one of the Bush administration's most shallow and insanely stupid ideas. At first I thought it was all a joke, but then I saw it might actually be a fact....or is is ?....surely not...

What will this guy think of next.....

RHC

G. Morgan wrote:

Reply to
tourman

You are kidding, right!?!

"The Blue Brick is a newspaper parody and satire website. This is not an actual news site. Full disclaimer."

formatting link

Reply to
G. Morgan

The government intially had reservations about the three year contract and even when ADT offered free installs they still hesitated, it was the free keypad with a red "fire" button on it that finally clinched the deal.

Doug

Reply to
Doug

There's no dearth of those.

It is. Nevertheless, you're right. Bush is a moron.

Reply to
Robert L Bass

"Robert L Bass" a écrit dans le message de news:

4e6dnQNqdqBCQa_YnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@comcast.com...

On that point I will say that you must be right..but I cant say for sure,cause only a moron can tell that another one his a real moron...

Reply to
Petem

If you couldn't figure out it was a joke in less than 1 second then I am glad you live where you live and not here. Let me see "shallow and insanely stupid"? Yes, your post certainly qualifies for that distinction! Do you know your own IQ score by the way? Good enough to get into any ivy league school I suspect. Do share it with us so we have something to gauge the merit of your other observations by. Do you read 10 to 15 books a month? What topics do you prefer? Economics? A heavy philosophical treatise? What tomes have pleased you most recently? Do tell all! Please let us know where you received your MBA (or equivalent in your country and where it was from). What was your GPA and position in your class? I am sure you are proud of that and would be eager to share it with us. And I missed where you learned how to pilot a jet. Not a pilot? Too bad! I suspect perhaps you have a future as a pilot, probably the hot air type of some sort. Of course the above is a brief contrast of you and of the things George W. Bush does or has done. If he is at or near the bottom of the intellectual food chain in your view, where are you? In American Baseball, something George W. Bush knows something about too, you would be playing the position they call "left out" I believe. However if you do come visit us here in the USA someday I hope you can drive here from where you are. We have an extra passanger that posts here that would be right at home with you on your little yellow bus on your way back. You may need a come along (perhaps called a lever hoist where you are from) and a "A" frame to help him and you remove the respective feet from your mouths. Be forewarned that some folks that post here want to donate their foot for his other end and a foot for yours too perhaps if you have any other similar observations to make in the future. If you think these comments a bit harsh, you should be thankful that this might be WW III coming and not WW I again. Here is a breif U.S. History lesson for foreigners to see where a little political criticism in the USA can get you if said at the wrong time. Let's see what happened to some folks (some of whom I suspect are your heroes) after the Espionage Act was passed by Congress in 1917. Eugene Victor Debs. (by the way a good Democrat in the Indiana Legislature and socialist - perhaps that is a redundant statement) sentenced to 10 years for one speech no less, unfortunately he served only 3. William Dudley Haywood. Big socialist publisher, but he got that eye for an eye thing confused. He got 20 years but fled to Russia. Died there too. What a guy! Go and be near Joe Stalin. That says it all. Asa Philip Randolph. A man who apparently thought being black should exclude one from national service and said so. Clink. Victor Berger. He probably got the worst sentence of them all. Bypassed jail and got elected to Congress while out on appeal. And worst of all got a pardon from a Republican President. (Read on it really starts to go down hill from here) John Reed. Wrote a lot (The Masses) and sounds just like you do in your post. Here is a taste (below) to see if that doesn't fit your world view. "No recent words have seemed to me so ludicrously condescending as the Kaiser's speech to his people when he said that in this supreme crisis he freely forgave all those who had ever opposed him. I am ashamed that in this day in a civilized country any one can speak such archaic nonsense as that speech contained. More nauseating than the crack-brained bombast of the Kaiser is the editorial chorus in America which pretends to believe - would have us believe - that the White and Spotless Knight of Modern Democracy is marching against the Unspeakably Vile Monster of Medieval Militarism. What has democracy to do in alliance with Nicholas, the Tsar? It is Liberalism which is marching from the Petersburg of Father Gapon, from the Odessa of Progroms? Are our editors naive enough to believe this? We, who are Socialists, must hope - we may even expect - that out of this horror of bloodshed and dire destruction will come far-reaching social changes - and a long step forward towards our goal of peace among men. But we must not be duped by this editorial buncombe about Liberalism going forth to Holy War against Tyranny. This is not our war." John Reed died young of Typus. Like most liberals and socialist he wrote a lot but learned nothing, especially about Ectoparasites. What should I say about rats and fleas, no too easy. Let's say stupidity is its own reward and he certainly got his. Max Eastman. He just published critical articles in The Masses. Hung jurry after two trials. I bet that left him broke. It must have broken something in him too because he went from left to right. He went to work for the Reader's Digest and then supported Joe McCarthy! I can't tell which is worse. Emma Goldman. The world owed her and everyone else a living. She decided that the unemployed should steal the food they needed. Talk about family values she was promoting free love and birth control way before the '60s. Here She simply opposed conscription, and only got two years for that. In the end of her life special permission had to be obtained to bring her carcass to back to the USA to be buried. Emma Goldman lamented in her autobiography that there were about 100 folks that were cought up with her in the trial and destroyed. Many for just handing out tracts. Up to 10,000 were eventually hauled off to jail or deported by J. Edgar or the rest of the FBI boys that followed his pink panties. Funny but major portions of the Espionage Act remain part of United States law (18 USC 793, 794). The best part is that a Democratic President, Woodrow Wilson, was the big push behind it all and was proud of it! (Picture Bob Newhart in a one way conversation for a moment here) Wait a minute. Wait! Yes! I think someone just spilled their Kool-Aid again. No he's choking. I can't tell is it grape flavor or is he turning blue? Man he spit it all over everything! This is ugly! He's down on the floor snapping at flies. He looks like a cold tuna bouncing around on a hot deck. Wait. wait.... he is saying something Help maybe? no, no, He is saying ..It? yes, "it"... get his hand away from his throat It. It what? It.. It Yes "It" we understand. It can't.. Yes we understand! "It can't" He's gurgling something, I think it's be true. Yes "be true" Oh, "It can't be true". "Oh yes, positively true!" "No, no sorry no Fox news to blame." "No, I promise there was no Fox news." "Yes." "Yes the BBC reported about it eventually when it came into being." "No, no Fox news!" "Yes I am sure Rupert Murdock wasn't born yet." "Yes, I am sure Wilson was a Democrat." "Yes big 'D' Democrat as in not Republican" "Yes Democrat, Yes all Wilson's idea start to finish" "Yes the Supreme Court Upheld it." "Yes it upheld it, Yes, yes in

1919" "No. no take the gun out of your mouth and calm down." "Yes, it was all in Emma's autobiography." "Stop screaming" 'TAKE ME NOW'!" "Here, breathe into the paper bag, you'll be fine." "Okay we will talk about Thorstein Veblen if that will make you feel better."(Okay turn off Bob Newhart)

To see feeble posts like yours parroting off the cuff political remarks truly reflects a barbaric level of stupidity on your part. No I don't hope you will get it eventually get it because you've identified with a group of folks that make it a practice not to get anything that might in some way help the other side. It really doesn't matter to me whether you bury your snout in the trough on the left or the one on the right. Unless you take the time and trouble to find the truth for yourself it is all the same swill. It all looks the same, tastes the same and stinks the same, and you and some others here are apparently happy eating all they can get. Try to break you lazzy ass away from the trough long enough to come up for some fresh air. My point is simple. This whole situation fighting terror might be on a real downturn before it sees an upside. Drive by comments like yours when flag draped coffins are coming home are not appreciated by everyone. If the level of toleration gets too thin, and the past says anything about the future, who knows what measures, legal or otherwise, comments like yours may provoke. Again, attitudes like yours might be the cool thing to have in your neck of the woods, (you and others that post similar drivel have already proven beyond any doubt not to be bright enough to come up with them or much of anything else on your own), but they aren't universally appreciated here in this country. I feel certain all sides of this issue will be surprised, for all of us that may still be around in 30 or so years, to see how the History Channel tells us the current events really unfolded behind the scenes. Until then, unless you have loved ones in harms way or soon could have, a word to the wise says to be more reflective and circumspect in your future posts. I doubt this post will mean much too you. You'll probably dive right back into the swill so deeply the last thing anyone one will see or hear from you is your curly brushy tail going under and a big "Oink" bubble coming up. What a legacy!

"tourman" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Reply to
Roland Moore

Holy Shit....I am damn sure a man in Ottawa wont like this.... And he sure didn't deserve that.....

Roland I hope you were not in your "normal" state of mind when you wrote that...

"Roland Moore" a écrit dans le message de news: hNIYg.105655$ snipped-for-privacy@tornado.texas.rr.com...

Reply to
Petem

I don't like or dislike it. I gave up reading it after the first couple of lines since it has nothing to do with security. Political or religious discussions bring out the strongest feelings from a lot of people. But it's exactly the reason I try to stay out of other country's political discussions.

I'm glad it was a joke. I wouldn't think that ADT would want their signs misused that way.

RHC

Petem wrote:

Reply to
tourman

Just put one sign in New York and one in California and motion detector somewhere in Kansas City and whalla!!!! An ADT state of the art security system protecting the Red, White and Blue. I can finally sleep tonight.

"J. @netscape.net>"

Reply to
Bob Worthy

Damn, how could I have not seen that as a joke !! Maybe Jim (alarminex) is right for once, I have my dislike for ADT so far up my butt, I can't see the humour in things when it comes to them.

RHC

Bob Worthy wrote:

Reply to
tourman

Like Clint Eastwood said in the movie Unforgiven "Deserve ain't got nothin' to do with it". I don't know the "man from Ottawa" from the man in the moon. I wasn't trying to be offensive or not to be offensive. There was no reason to be either one. There are legitimate questions in the post. Please pay less attention to the sizzle and more to the steak. Again it wasn't meant to be offensive. If someone wants to describe something one way or another isn't it fair to examine his or her credentials? I don't want to go Bass fishing here, but political bromides like Bush is a ...FILL IN THE BLANK where the blank says less than normal intelligence I really want to know. Although I hear that often sort of thing, as a practical matter there are few people in real life that I (or you I supect) ever meet that on on par with him. You might disagree with that statement, but I have a good deal of first hand knowledge to prove otherwise and would. Being smart doesn't make you a good president necessarily. Being a bad president doesn't cause your IQ to mysteriously fall. You might think Bush is an aweful president. If so then say that straight out. Maybe say why you think that or maybe say nothing at all. Most folks are their own experts at how they feel about something or someone. Richard Nixon was very bright, maybe the smartest of the his century. A good president? Who could see past the flaws to know, certainly he couldn't himself. Over all he would fall on the very bad president scale in most people's eyes. Didn't mean he wasn't extremely bright either before, during, or after his term in office. William Clinton? Probably not as smart as Nixon. A good president? Too soon to tell. If you or he were offended try to read the post again and just honestly answer the questions. He felt free to share his views, why be shy now? Please share more. I always want to be ready to try and learn more whenever I can. I thought we agreed on one thing for certain, he seems glad that he lives in Canada and so am I. See? Both very happy and that is my "normal" state of mind.

"Petem" wrote in message news:RAJYg.2268$ snipped-for-privacy@weber.videotron.net...

Reply to
Roland Moore

It might be time for a vacation, RHC. It's nice in SoCal this time of year. js

Reply to
alarman

Heh, heh, heh. :^)

Reply to
Robert L Bass

It just comes naturally?

Reply to
Robert L Bass

Yeah Jack, you could have something there. I think though, I just made the all too common mistake on the newsgroup of putting my mouth in gear while my brain was still in neutral. I better read things more carefully before I respond instead of seeing red everytime I see or hear of big blue...

Now that other dude, man...is he uptight....:))

RHC

alarman wrote:

Reply to
tourman

Well of course it was a joke. Everybody knows the real ADT border security yard signs are in Spanish.

Reply to
Nomen Nescio

Robert, you're such a frickin hypocrite!

Somebody posts a political comment. You respond with your opinion of The President of the United States. When someone responds to your comment and shoves it back up your ass All of a sudden you're not interested because it doesn't have anything to do with with security and you make the absurd comment

"But it's exactly the reason I try to stay out of other country's political discussions"

Jeeeeeeeze!

If you were a little bit dumber, you might even have contradicted yourself in the same sentence rather than just in your next post.

Reply to
Jim

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.