Yes, I see that.
But, it's also contrary to my nature to attack unless provoked, I also dont know the entire story with RLB, nor do I really care.
| | The way I took it is: | | You are one of the few people who don't challange him for his obviously | abhorent conduct here. When YOU asked him why he did that (give out the | PW/CW), in any way that he responded to you, he could not have | justified it with out getting a negative reply from you. You'll notice | that was his last post. He therefore realized that he would have lost | one more person who nomally remains neutral. All he had to do was "drop | out" for a while and it'll blow over with out him ever having a | confrontation with you. See how that works? As long as there is | division here in how to treat him or lack of any objection to his | conduct, he will continue to disrupt this Newsgroup. Ignoring him is | enabling him to continue. | | You'll notice the calm and that the discussions taking place now, are | right in line with what you always thought they should be. And why not? | It's always that way with out him. |