Hi Jan,
You may find the Cisco Product Advisor helpful:
Brad Reese BradReese.Com Cisco Repair Service Experts
1293 Hendersonville Road, Suite 17 Asheville, North Carolina USA 28803 Toll Free: 877-549-2680 International: 828-277-7272 Website:Hi Jan,
You may find the Cisco Product Advisor helpful:
Brad Reese BradReese.Com Cisco Repair Service Experts
1293 Hendersonville Road, Suite 17 Asheville, North Carolina USA 28803 Toll Free: 877-549-2680 International: 828-277-7272 Website:Which router?
One or two symmetric frame relay 2000/2000 and one or two 2000/256 DSL. Routing, bandwidth managing, authorisation on another LAN machine(s).
I want to share some traffic to every provider without load balancing feature (which doubles the costs in my case). I want to have one or two 100 Mbps ethernet LAN ports. Cisco will act only as a simple V.35-ethernet adapter and do some simple routing, qos, etc... Nice to have is automatic switching of all traffic from dead WAN to other provider. I need:
- minimum 25 000 pps real traffic which is about 40-50 kpps of what written in the tech specs,
- 2 V.35 ports,
- 2 ethernet WAN full duplex, ports
- 1-2 ethernet LAN 100 Mbps, full duplex ports
- SSH instead of telnet.
Currently I use old 2501 but on one 2/2 Mbps link I have about 50-60% CPU use.
I'm cisco beginner and my types are:
So which router and how much memory do I need? Thanks
Hi,
I would go for a 2800 series router, for example the 2811 or larger. Then add the required WIC's for your frame and dsl connections (1x WIC-2T and 2x WIC-1ADSL...). With the security featurepack the router supports SSH. Ask your providers to provide you a BGP default-route (or default-route + local nets) in order to implement the dead-WAN-failover. Failover can also be implemented using the SAA if you like, then you don't need the BGP default-route.
Erik
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required