Integrating Frame Relay and DSL - which router?

Jul 16, 2005 2 Replies

Hi Jan,

You may find the Cisco Product Advisor helpful:

formatting link
as well as the Cisco Solution Designer:

formatting link
Sincerely,

Brad Reese BradReese.Com Cisco Repair Service Experts

1293 Hendersonville Road, Suite 17 Asheville, North Carolina USA 28803 Toll Free: 877-549-2680 International: 828-277-7272 Website:
formatting link

Which router?



One or two symmetric frame relay 2000/2000 and one or two 2000/256 DSL. Routing, bandwidth managing, authorisation on another LAN machine(s).



I want to share some traffic to every provider without load balancing feature (which doubles the costs in my case). I want to have one or two 100 Mbps ethernet LAN ports. Cisco will act only as a simple V.35-ethernet adapter and do some simple routing, qos, etc... Nice to have is automatic switching of all traffic from dead WAN to other provider. I need:



- minimum 25 000 pps real traffic which is about 40-50 kpps of what written in the tech specs,



- 2 V.35 ports,



- 2 ethernet WAN full duplex, ports



- 1-2 ethernet LAN 100 Mbps, full duplex ports



- SSH instead of telnet.



Currently I use old 2501 but on one 2/2 Mbps link I have about 50-60% CPU use.


I'm cisco beginner and my types are:



17xx
26xx series
26xxXM
36xx - 3640
47xx

So which router and how much memory do I need? Thanks


Hi,

I would go for a 2800 series router, for example the 2811 or larger. Then add the required WIC's for your frame and dsl connections (1x WIC-2T and 2x WIC-1ADSL...). With the security featurepack the router supports SSH. Ask your providers to provide you a BGP default-route (or default-route + local nets) in order to implement the dead-WAN-failover. Failover can also be implemented using the SAA if you like, then you don't need the BGP default-route.

Erik

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required