Nope. David Lesher is (virtually always) *precisely* correct. A T1 is one particular type of digital carrier. It isn't really all that common anymore if you want to get pedantic about defining what really is a T1.
A DS1 is one particular interface. It is almost universal these days. A DS1 format is virtually *always* what you see when you get a 1.536Mbps data circuit (which has a 1.544Mbps line rate).
Nah, he just needs some particular kind of a facility that will provide 1.536Mbps framed data to the interface.
A DS1 is a very well defined interface. The voltages, waveforms, impedances, etc. etc. are all clearly specified. A "T1" (using the most loose definition possible) can be just about anything, and any two of them probably won't work with each other. Hence to very common DS1 interface between them. A T1 using the technically correct definition is a facility which does in fact use exactly the same formatting as the original T1, and they will all work with each other.
I doubt that he forgot it, because it is irrelevant. It isn't necessarily correct either, depending on how you define "end subscribers". Of course *I* have always worked where a telephone company *was* just an "end subscriber"! You probably wouldn't think in those terms though...
No, there are not 28 T1's in a T3. There might well be 28 DS1 interfaces in front of a T3 though! Might not too...
BTW, ever see a T2 other than inside a M13?