atec"
slot design
Mar 04, 2005
33 Replies
hi, have you seen the multi-polarized antennae(some call em snake-oil!) on
formatting link
i found another site selling the same stuff under their own brand (OEM or ODM?)
formatting link
their tetrads should suit your purpose i guess.
I've seen at least a couple units made like that! Designed to be externally mounted, with power and data fed over CAT5 cable. Of course these things cost a good bit more than the consumer grade products that most of us talk about here... :-)
I wonder about that restriction on USB cable length too. I have no idea just exactly what limits it to 15 feet, but I suspect it might be the power leads rather than the data. If that is true, it might be that a device which uses significantly less than the maximum power could actually be used on significantly longer cables.
I've got a couple of 15 foot USB extention cables here somewhere, and someday I'm going to test that to find out... But I don't have any USB wifi devices, so whatever tests I might do wouldn't necessarily apply to those.
I'll assume 2.4GHz. 4 slot antenna:
formatting link
$365/ea.
Wanna disclose what you're trying to accomplish, what you have to work with, and why you think a horizontally polarized slot antenna, which is normally used as a sector antenna, is the "ticket"?
formatting link
> Only $365/ea.
I assumed horizontal polarization because vertically mounted slot antennas are almost always horizontally polarized. That's because you can build a vertically polarized sector antenna, with similar characteristics, much easier and cheaper using a vertical colinear.
It is possible to design a vertically polarized slot antenna, but the geometry and pattern are rather odd looking. These were used for early WWII era aircraft night-fighter RADAR, where the antennas were waveguide slots on the leading edge of the wings.
The link above is horizontal polarization. The various examples of Alford Slot antennas are all horizontally polarized.
formatting link
various examples derived from the design by Trevor Marshall at:
formatting link
all horizontal. Incidentally, the above article gives dimensions and construction details for milling your own. More:
formatting link
Another $300 antenna:
formatting link
Horizontal polarization has some really nice advantages when dealing with interference as most everyone else is using vertical polarization.
Good luck, whatever you're trying to do.
Why? Well, your ISP's terms of service may restrict redistribution of bandwidth off the property limits. Of course, few enforce such restrictions and everyone does wireless, so I think you're probably safe.
Watch your tolerances. See the ACAD DWG on Trevor Marshall's site. Note the tolerances. They're tight. I worked out the numbers in another posting but the total error to drift out of the 2.4Ghz band for a 1/2 wave dipole is something like 1.5mm max. This is not something you can build with a drill, file, and tape measure.
9913 is not too good at 2.4Ghz (0.62db/meter @ 2.4Ghz). I prefer LMR-400 (0.22dB/meter) but 9913 is good enough for short runs (less than about a meter).May I recommend you build a pair of biquad antennas instead.
formatting link
formatting link
the coax fairly long so that you don't need a pigtail. I dunno about finding a reverse TNC connector for 9913. Therefore, I suggest a male N connector, and buying a female N to R-TNC adapter.
formatting link
hate to admit it, but I use RG-6/u and RG-58c/u for my biquads. Very lossy, but for short runs, the coax doesn't have much effect.
Good luck.
Yeah. You mentioned using 15 meters of coax. That's 9.3dB of loss for 9913 or about 85% of your power gone up in smoke. Methinks that's way too much coax. If you switch to LMR-400, you'll still lose 3.3dB or a bit more than half your power, which is much better. Lose the
9913 please and buy some LMR-400 (or bigger).This you call monster invisible?
formatting link
formatting link
ok. The machine shop will be a big help. Good luck.
One more slot antenna:
formatting link
one is quite different from Trevor Marshall's. I dunno about the zinc plates steel "downpipe" used.
I used to work with lots of aluminium jacketed CATV coax of various dimensions. Bending the larger stuff requires an EMT bender. That's hard line. 9913 is aluminium foil and braid, which is NOT what I would call hard line. It's usually listed as "low loss RG-8/u".
yeah, that will work if you mount it in the middle of the window. One problem with such a sector or omni antenna is that you can't really put it next to anything metallic or reflective as it will wreck the pattern and possibly increase the VSWR. So, you plan to spoil someones view by planting it in the middle of their view? Actually, that's not a bad idea. Plant the lower end into a flower pot, add some soil for stability, decorate with plastic plants, and it will be invisible.
Incidentally, some "energy efficient" tinted windows are aluminized and block RF. I suggest a fast test to make sure they'll work.
Agreed. I do badly with insufficient information. I like numbers.
I guess math isn't part of the job requirement. You're installing 15 meters of fairly high loss coax cable to a 1.5 meter long antenna that is being used for a point to point link and delivers perhaps 15dBi gain on a 180 degree sector. Meanwhile, a 14dBi panel antenna is perhaps 200mm x 200mm for the same gain and a narrower 35 degree beamwidth (so you don't have do deal with reflections). You "found" the 9913 which is not commonly used at 2.4Ghz as a simple loss calculation will show.
It took me a while to find Belden 1573A data. It's not in the online version of the Belden catalog. Google found one reference to Belden
1573A which claims it's the same as RG-402 which is 0.141" semi-rigid cable. I use the stuff for short jumpers, SMA patch cables, phasing lines, and pigtails from PCMCIA cards with no antenna connector. The loss is 0.875/meter at 2.4GHz which has more loss than 9913. Just to make life interesting, Belden recycled the part number which was an 8 pair #24 awg cable, but is now obsolete.At 600meters link distantce, your proposed arrangement should sorta work as described, even with the lossy coax. Range: 0.373 miles (600 meters) TX power: +15 dBm TX ant gain: +14 dbi TX coax loss: -9dB (15 meters 9913) RX send: -83 dBm RX ant gain: +14 dbi RX coax loss: -9dB (15 meters 9913) Using:
formatting link
get 12.4dB fade margin, which should be sufficient to get a marginal and flakey connection. I suggest you do something about the coax loss.
I did some disorganized tinkering with extension cables and can offer some anecdotal evidence. I was able to locally power a WUSB54G with
5.0VDC and get it to somewhat function using one pair from a 50ft piece of CAT5E cable. The xmit signal was 1.5 volts peak to peak and the received signal was about 400mv p-p when it crapped out. That's about 10dB of cable loss where the max length can be calculated for various cables.There are also rise time and timing delay specs, which I don't claim to have read:
formatting link
's quite a bit in there...
I had trouble trying to figure out why my local 5V power would stick the device in USB 1.1 mode instead of 2.0. It seems that one has to have a common DC power ground so that one of the data lines can be pulled high (3.3v) to indicate it's a USB 2.0 device. Grrrr...
formatting link
Fig 2 and 3. I never did get it working correctly because of all the DC level signaling that was required. More:
formatting link
Specifications on a "typical" USB chip. See:
formatting link
the input sensitivity of 200mv with a hysteresis of 250mv. Same here:
formatting link
I read that correctly, the receiver needs 450mv p-p input to work.
Incidentally, the WUSB54G apparently functioned down to an applied voltage of about 3.8VDC. However, I kept getting stuck with USB 1.1 mode instead of 2.0 so that's not really totally functional.
I can re-measure any of the above. However, I'm down to my last scope probe and can't really measure the signal levels without pair of probes with the scope in differential input mode.
Can save you the trouble... I have one of those little "dongles" that plug into a USB port on a computer or other device (a few oz'z and an inch or so long). I was experimenting and trying it with USB extension cables rather than plugging it in directly into my laptop. When the USB extension cables are added on, you start getting more errors (at about 45 FT it becme so error ridden it was unusable), that's when my partner at work suggeted ethernet (they make and sell Power over Ethernet devices) and can go about
100M (348ft). When I started looking, all I could find was pre-made USB "dongles", and started wondering why there are no ethernet dongles (they do make ethernet to usb converters, I have one on order for my DVR - USB output only, but ethernet on my home network).. Sure would be neat to have ethernet dongles that can just plug into an ethernet port and be on the network.As for cost, the USB dongles are about $35 (ethernet to USB converter is about $18), with economy of scale, I would suspect they would be under $50 if made together in one package, and rather than an internal antenna, a mini-uhf connector to hook to external antennas to it, should make a negligable difference in cost. Just to be clear, they make consumer grade USB "dongles", adding ethernet and POE options, Seems like it would be a perfect consumer grade device.
Good Lord, *don't* entice him! Jeff's CV is probably 2000 pages long and lists the path margin on every system he's ever implemented... ;-)
....
With a little difference too. Jeff is doing the systems engineering, not just installation. He's figuring out *what* to install, not just how and where.
A *very* significant difference...
Any one got information as I need to shoot a link about 600 metres and am thinking a home made slot would be the ticket . (and ues its los if I go up 10 metres whixh means 15 metres of coax all up)
formatting link
Only $365/ea.
no I don't , I do know its the way to go , for my purposes. nice link but Ill have to find more as I said I intend making one or two of then , now why you assume its horizontal in polarisation ?
formatting link
formatting link
From the house to the office , why buy two dsl 3 mbs ? I've opted for waves because I can make them in the neighbours shop , with a corner refletor and a vpn should do the trick and it will be cheap Im sure .. plenty of 9913 here and lots of connectors so I figure about an hour each plus install at almost nothing each with coax . looking at the retail prices Im glad I have the facilities .
it may , but there are ways , and seeing I have a fiscal interest it doesn't matter ..
didn't read it did you . he has a serious machine shop , so a vertical cnc and 20 minutes to set it up. easy
I'm a contractor and install all sorts of things as part of my business, just found 40 metres of hard core .. any other problems ?
not interested in quads , been there and they work but because of the situation at the office the slots will be almost invisible so that's what I'm using , thanks anyway ... will have them made in another hour or two and fit tomorrow...
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required