hey, i'm interested in compiling a list of devices that use the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, respectively. i know microwave ovens and cordless phones tend to use 2.4, for example. this is reasearch that may exist out there already, but i work at a media advocacy group called prometheus radio project that's trying to compile as much as we can on wireless broadcasting and community wireless networks. drop me a line here, or at hannahjs (at) prometheusradio.org with your thoughts.
hannah s. prometheusradioproject
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
J
JM
Amateur Radio 2.3 to 2.45Ghz for Amateur Radio Television Repeaters and simplex TV operation.
-- JM
J
Jeff Liebermann
Hmmmm... Well, maybe go to the FCC ID web pile at:
formatting link
search for devices that have receive approval for Part 15 intentional and unintentional radiators. There should be several thousand devices listed. Is that what you want? What's a "device"?
Well, if you want classes of devices and technology that use
2.4/5.7GHz as intentional radiators, we have (off the top of my rapidly deplititating head).
High speed point to point links that use proprietary protocols.
Microwave ovens.
RF excited sulfur lamps by Fusion Lighting (defunct). |
formatting link
Wireless video extensions for security cameras and X10 systems.
Wireless mouse and keyboard (mostly using Wireless USB from Cypress semiconductor). |
formatting link
Bluetooth
Zigbee
Microwave fruit dryers, plastics preheaters, and moisture removers.
ISM (Industrial, scientific, manufacturing) devices used in research.
Low speed 2.4GHz data links. For example: |
formatting link
WiMax on 2.4 and 5.6GHz. (Clearwire, NextNet)
Karlnet based WISP (wireless internet service provider).
I probably forgot a bunch, but is this what you want? Why are you making this list (I'm curious)?
R
Rob
formatting link
8. Bluetooth
I think they already have a list.They seem to be fairly well acquainted with the FCC.
formatting link
Rob
J
Jeff Liebermann
JUst trying to help. The site appears to be 99% about Low Power FM broadcasting. Reading the last link (above), they seem to consider
2.4GHz as an alternative to LPFM as a means of providing "community media". I read all 9 pages twice and still can't figure out exactly what they're trying to accomplish.
R
Rob
Jeff Liebermann wrote: I read all 9 pages twice and still can't figure out exactly
I just re-read it and I know what you mean.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.