Re: Use of Bell Logo: Qwest? SBC?

Trademarks must remain in use to remain legally protected, so I'm

> curious where and how Qwest ("my" Baby Bell) uses the Bell logo, if at > all. In most cases Qwest has eliminated it since merging with US > West. You can still make out the shadow of a Bell logo removed from > the wall of a Qwest building in Ankeny, Iowa, for example. > Last night on the way to a wedding reception I saw a Bell logo that > Qwest hasn't gotten rid of: a wooden pay phone kiosk inside the south > entrance of the Sioux Falls VFW Lounge still has a Bell sign on top, > with the blue Bell logo to the left of the word "phone". Except for > Qwest signs tacked to the sides of the kiosk it looked a couple > decades old. Does Qwest affixing new signs without taking down the > Bell sign count as current use for trademark purposes? It seems > better than the example Qwest filed with the USPTO in 2003, which was > a couple photos of a US West payphone kiosk, which didn't even have > the Qwest identity. > Even without the logo, Qwest does try to connect less obviously to the > Bell identity. Its Dex phone book is still blue and gold, the Qwest > logotype is in the Gill Sans font which has also been the corporate > font of AT&T (although the Bell System used Helvetica), and their > current slogan is "Spirit of Service", a long-time Bell System motto. > Arguably, Qwest's blue swoosh logo echos the circular blue Bell logo > -- or would, at least, clash with it if the Bell logo were also > present. > Has anyone ever seen an example of Qwest intentionally adding the Bell > logo to anything anywhere? I wonder what they'll come up with when > their next trademark filing is due. > The other RBOCs have filed their own claims of Bell logo usage: > In 2002, SBC submitted a photo of a white service truck with blue and > gold stripes and Southwestern Bell Telephone markings. Do their > trucks still look like that? It's about as convincing as Qwest's US > West phone booth. It'll be interesting to learn what SBC does with > branding after their purchase of AT&T. > Also in 2002, Verizon submitted photos of new Verizon service trucks > and pay phones featuring the Bell logo. IMO Verizon has cleverly > dealt with the Bell logo "problem", that is, keeping it alive and > meaningful but not letting it compete with their own created identity. > Finally, both of the Baby Bells that don't use the Bell logo > themselves license Bell names and logos to equipment manufacturers. > Qwest licenses Northwestern Bell to Unical and SBC licenses > Southwestern Bell to Conair. This despite Northwestern Bell and > Southwestern Bell no longer being names Qwest or SBC use themselves, > and the fact that while Qwest and SBC sell phone equipment on their > websites, it's not their licensed Bell-branded equipment. > Bell logo trademark registrations can be found by searching for design > code 220324 260101 at the USPTO.

I believe that all their old names such as Northwestern Bell Telephone are still registered with the states in which they served as well as the US Copyright office.

I know that GTE is in California is still listed. And that was a non-Bell before the merger.

The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2005 I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot in Hell Co.

Reply to
Steven Lichter
Loading thread data ... Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.