Re: Palm Treo 650

Thank you. I guess it has gotten to the point where sending to telecom digest is a waste of time. I am a faithful reader and *never* in the instructions for submission have you ever said anything of the kind.

--- TELECOM Digest Editor wrote:

From: Mr Joseph Singer > Subject: Re: Palm Treo 650 > --- TELECOM Digest Editor wrote: > Your recent submission to TELECOM Digest was rejected. If you feel it > should be printed, please resubmit it with the Secret Word as part of > the subject line. > Editor, TELECOM Digest > What's this "secret word" business? Since when is there a > secret word to submit to Telecom Digest? > When spam got to the point that about 95-98 percent of all incoming > mail to telecom was spam, I changed from attempting to examine it and > accept 2 or 3 percent while rejecting 95-98 percent of it and simply > started rejecting all of it. Made it a lot easier for me. I of course > still go through it now and pick out names I recognize (as I did with > your name and subject) manually, but I do not read ANYTHING of it > until I have first officially dumped all the spam (almost all of it). > People who read the Digest on a regular basis know the secret word > which is (secret word). If that word appears anywhere in the subject line > then delivery of the message is sent a step further to a box of > known writer/subscribers, etc.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Although I _attempt_ to review all the mounds of spam each day looking for any clues of a real person there, you must admit 95-98 percent spam to real mail is a very high ratio. Consequently, some good mail gets missed, sorry. But putting the secret work in the subject line of each message absolutely assures that your mail goes into a file for proper handling. PAT]
Reply to
Mr Joseph Singer
Loading thread data ... Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.