formatting link
court is being consistent with binky ruling.
- posted
15 years ago
seen this before?
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
formatting link
I see that happening with the "little guy", but it appears that at least one company has argued (the story doesn't state "successfully") that the software in the phones is not the property of a particular provider. I'd be more interested in hearing the results of *that* particular argument. It would blow "Binky" out of the water because they do *not* manufacture their own panels.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
formatting link
that will be veerryy interesting.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
'tis interesting indeed, the difference is that Binky doesn't sell "their" alarm panels.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Brinks owns the hardware and the software, regardless who custom made it for them.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
The problem is that Brinks *does* sell "their" alarm panels.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
really? is this another bassism?
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Nope. You only cited the Crashism.