DSC4020CF: Epilogue

Well, I sent the 4020CF board back for exchange because I thought it was defective. It wouldn't answer the phone for a download call.

Got the new board and bench tested it, it worked fine, answered the phone by number of rings, PC link, and answering machine defeat, no problem. I program the board on my bench with PC link, test again, and all is well. The next day, I install the board, connect the phone lines, 4702 bell module, and 4701 phone line module. (Yeah, you need both of those peripheral modules to make the 4020CF an actual commercial fire panel.) Power the panel up, and enroll the modules. Call the panel, and....no answer. Tried again, no luck.

So it looks like the engineer nannies at DSC have disabled unattended downloading in the new s/w, v 3.54, once the panel detects the 4701 module. Yeah, I know you're not supposed to do it, but, well, I kind of like to make that decision myself. (The panel can still initiate a call if someone is at the keypad.)

The funny part is that DSC tech support doesn't know it. Well, the booger eaters who answer the phone don't anyway. Nor did the "senior tech" I spoke with.

Come to think of it, it's not that funny after all.

No more DSC "fire" panels for me.

Reply to
Buggs
Loading thread data ...

Reply to
Roland More

Nah, what fun is that? Anyway, I like a panel I can put my hands on without doing the proprietayy shuffle. Maybe SK? js

Reply to
Buggs

Don't blame DSC, except for their tech support not knowing what's going on. UL is changing the rules, and this will soon be par for the course for all UL listed fire panels.

As of December 31, 2008, initial programming or any subsequent reprogramming of a fire panel will require someone at the panel to enter a code first, either for local or remote programming. The exceptions are that receiver phone numbers can be changed remotely without someone at the panel, and purely proprietary systems can be remotely reprogrammed as well. That doesn't mean the manufacturers have to build in the ability to change phone numbers remotely, but they can if they want to.

See UL 864, paragraph 54.2.4.

So the DSC engineers are just getting a head start on the new requirements.

- badenov

Reply to
Nomen Nescio

Edwards was already doing this several years ago.

Reply to
Robert L Bass

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.