Of the individuals that post here regularly, Mark is one of the most upstanding and helpful I know. Unlike you, he's never lied or plagiarized someone else's work.
that in the event they are held liable for any customer
monitoring fees, whichever is lesser. The precise amount
times over the years and you have participated in
Yes, it has. There was a similar "limitation clause" in Chubb's contract, yet when a customers premise burned down and the alarm failed to notify the station, they were held liable for significant damages
*over and above* the so-called "limitation".All of the individuals *in the trade* that post here are either owners, managers, or employees of alarm companies. Alarm companies (in most states and provinces) need to be licensed, bonded and *insured*. When I say "insured", that means they carry a significant amount of liability coverage (usually on the order of 5 million dollars, but that amount increases depending on the type of work they're involved in). From your statement concerning "limitation of liability", I take it you've never carried liability insurance, errors and omissions, or failure to perform. You've relied entirely on the "$250.00 limitation clause" in your contract to protect your ass. You're a moron, Bass, and I for one am very glad that you no longer run (or are involved in) an alarm installation/service company. There are far too many "trunkers" out there as it is and one less is all for the better.
answered him correctly. You lied.
Interesting how you've managed to divert this thread with a few well placed "snips", isn't it?