As the subject says, I'd like to enable RIP advertisements of the netblks the Actiontec MI424WR router owns (uses "openrouter"?). I know I know, it should be easy but it's not documented or obvious :(
- posted
17 years ago
As the subject says, I'd like to enable RIP advertisements of the netblks the Actiontec MI424WR router owns (uses "openrouter"?). I know I know, it should be easy but it's not documented or obvious :(
I wouldn't guarantee it uses RIP but there is a reference to "Dynamic Routing" on page 64 of the manual.
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:13:55 +0000, Kev wrote: : Howard Goldstein wrote: : > As the subject says, I'd like to enable RIP advertisements of the : > netblks the Actiontec MI424WR router owns (uses "openrouter"?). I : > know I know, it should be easy but it's not documented or obvious :( : > : I wouldn't guarantee it uses RIP but there is a reference to "Dynamic : Routing" on page 64 of the manual.
Your page 64 doesnt match either of mine but I think I know what you're referring to if it's "domain routing" that "routes based on dns information." WTF is that?
The ad copy mentions RFC 1058 support but I'll be damned if I can figure out how to turn route advertisement feature on. I suppose I can run gated or something somewhere else to advertise on behalf of the Actiontec but now it's personal
I think I was just concentrating on this "Enter a device metric in the "Device Metric" text box. The device metric is a value used by the router to determine whether one route is superior to another, considering parameters such as bandwidth and delay time."
No mention of RFC 1058 in the manual or here:-
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:09:23 +0000, Kev wrote: : Howard Goldstein wrote: : > On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:13:55 +0000, Kev wrote: : > : Howard Goldstein wrote: : > : > As the subject says, I'd like to enable RIP advertisements of the : > : > netblks the Actiontec MI424WR router owns (uses "openrouter"?). I : > : > know I know, it should be easy but it's not documented or obvious :( : > : > : > : I wouldn't guarantee it uses RIP but there is a reference to "Dynamic : > : Routing" on page 64 of the manual. : > : > Your page 64 doesnt match either of mine but I think I know what : > you're referring to if it's "domain routing" that "routes based on dns : > information." WTF is that? : : I think I was just concentrating on this "Enter a device metric in the : "Device Metric" text box. The device metric is a value used by the : router to determine whether one route is superior to another, : considering parameters such as bandwidth and delay time."
This seems to drive the router's own routing table. Accessed from the shell it appears to set the metric for the bridged interfaces owned by the router.
It's actually a pretty cool router ... if it only had a familiar routed on it I'd be a happy camper instead of the bitter, frustrated old man I am with a vendetta to get route ads coming out of the thing.
: : > : > The ad copy mentions RFC 1058 support but I'll be damned if I can : > figure out how to turn route advertisement feature on. I suppose : > I can run gated or something somewhere else to advertise on behalf of : > the Actiontec but now it's personal : > : > : > : No mention of RFC 1058 in the manual or here:- :
It may be worth asking here:-
Having had a trawl through various web sites it seems some people believe that the f/ware is based on Jungo's OpenRG. If you look at the Dynamic Routing section, page 61, then RIP certainly used to be an option.
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:05:32 +0000, Kev wrote: : Howard Goldstein wrote: : > On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:09:23 +0000, Kev wrote: : > : Howard Goldstein wrote: : > : > On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:13:55 +0000, Kev wrote: : > : > : Howard Goldstein wrote: : > : > : > As the subject says, I'd like to enable RIP advertisements of the : > : > : > netblks the Actiontec MI424WR router owns (uses "openrouter"?). I : > : > : > know I know, it should be easy but it's not documented or obvious :( : > : > : > : > : > : I wouldn't guarantee it uses RIP but there is a reference to "Dynamic : > : > : Routing" on page 64 of the manual. : > : > : > : > Your page 64 doesnt match either of mine but I think I know what : > : > you're referring to if it's "domain routing" that "routes based on dns : > : > information." WTF is that? : > : : > : I think I was just concentrating on this "Enter a device metric in the : > : "Device Metric" text box. The device metric is a value used by the : > : router to determine whether one route is superior to another, : > : considering parameters such as bandwidth and delay time." : > : > This seems to drive the router's own routing table. Accessed from the : > shell it appears to set the metric for the bridged interfaces owned by : > the router. : > : > It's actually a pretty cool router ... if it only had a familiar routed : > on it I'd be a happy camper instead of the bitter, frustrated old man : > I am with a vendetta to get route ads coming out of the thing. : > : > : : > : > : > : > The ad copy mentions RFC 1058 support but I'll be damned if I can : > : > figure out how to turn route advertisement feature on. I suppose : > : > I can run gated or something somewhere else to advertise on behalf of : > : > the Actiontec but now it's personal : > : > : > : > : > : > : > : No mention of RFC 1058 in the manual or here:- : > :
The stock openrg product *does* include RIPv1 and v2 functionality via the point and drool menu but the verizon supplied version seems to have had that aspect castrated from the menu. However there were droppings left in a cryptic config file that have settings for RIP enable and versioning info and sure enough, flipping them and uploading the adulterated config back to the box has the thing emitting RIP and responding to rtquery queries.
It's not yet advertising its bridged interfaces which is what I need, but with it at least RIPping I'd say the panic is over.
In case anyone else is interested or needs to fight with this later FFR here be where docs live:
Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.