Nope, it isn't. So, basically, there's no way I can get the other ~6mps? If not, I can live with it.
David
William P.N. Smith wrote:
Nope, it isn't. So, basically, there's no way I can get the other ~6mps? If not, I can live with it.
David
William P.N. Smith wrote:
Well, you can try playing around with drivers, firmware, AP and client positioning, interference sources, channel changes, antennas, additional APs, alternate firmware, repeaters, different vendors, etc, but WiFi and {speed, reliability,marge file transfers} IME don't really go together.
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:56:05 -0400, William P.N. Smith wrote in :
I'd personally say it is pretty bad for 802.11g, which can be several times faster than that in good conditions. It's more like 802.11b.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required