(This is an email which I sent to the editors of The Philadelphia Enquirer.)
To the Editors,
The online version of the Inquirer for August 17th contains an image which insults both the individual portrayed, and other striking union workers at Verizon. I am referring to the page available at
This web page has a story headlined "Verizon strike is also a public relations fight", written on August 17, 2011, by "Jane M. Von Bergen, Inquirer Staff Writer". If I were a sightless person, using a text-to-speech converter to read the article in question, I might have come away with a better impression: the words on the page, however, do not match the image you chose to accompany them.
Even the caption for the photograph is innocuous: "Verizon worker Walter Amaral, of New Bedford, Mass., holds a placard and chants outside a Verizon office in Boston." However, the photo you chose to print is a jarring, and I think intentional, contrast to the article that it is next to.
The image that visitors to your website see is of a middle-aged man, who appears to be shouting rather than chanting, and who has shoulder-length, partially grey hair. I infer that your publication intended to demean both Mr. Amaral and the Union he is part of; that you intended to send a subliminal message that unions are no longer fashionable and that their members are too old to do their jobs.
Please, tell me why a publication that serves the Philadelphia area - or, for that matter, Pennsylvania - found it necessary to obtain a photograph of a striker walking a picket line in Boston. Why not a picture taken in your city of record? Did Verizon order you to use that photograph instead of others?
Bill Horne Moderator The Telecom Digest
43 Deerfiedl Road Sharon, MA 02067-2301
339-364-8487