Shame On You! [telecom]

Aug 18, 2011 2 Replies
Shame On You! [telecom] open original image

(This is an email which I sent to the editors of The Philadelphia Enquirer.)



To the Editors,



The online version of the Inquirer for August 17th contains an image which insults both the individual portrayed, and other striking union workers at Verizon. I am referring to the page available at

formatting link



This web page has a story headlined "Verizon strike is also a public relations fight", written on August 17, 2011, by "Jane M. Von Bergen, Inquirer Staff Writer". If I were a sightless person, using a text-to-speech converter to read the article in question, I might have come away with a better impression: the words on the page, however, do not match the image you chose to accompany them.



Even the caption for the photograph is innocuous: "Verizon worker Walter Amaral, of New Bedford, Mass., holds a placard and chants outside a Verizon office in Boston." However, the photo you chose to print is a jarring, and I think intentional, contrast to the article that it is next to.



The image that visitors to your website see is of a middle-aged man, who appears to be shouting rather than chanting, and who has shoulder-length, partially grey hair. I infer that your publication intended to demean both Mr. Amaral and the Union he is part of; that you intended to send a subliminal message that unions are no longer fashionable and that their members are too old to do their jobs.



Please, tell me why a publication that serves the Philadelphia area - or, for that matter, Pennsylvania - found it necessary to obtain a photograph of a striker walking a picket line in Boston. Why not a picture taken in your city of record? Did Verizon order you to use that photograph instead of others?


Bill Horne Moderator The Telecom Digest


43 Deerfiedl Road Sharon, MA 02067-2301
339-364-8487

[ ,,, ]

The same thing happens in the Oklahoman (Oklahoma City, Okla.) I think there is a common reason here--it costs money to go out and make their own local photo, while the wire services send them photos as a part of their services, or they can get a photo with a couple of clicks.

Wes Leatherock snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com snipped-for-privacy@aol.com

***** Moderator's Note *****

I don't believe it. Previous editions of The Inquirer had extensive pictures of Philadelphians on picket lines, and I've never met a photographer who didn't take four times more shots than he needed. They could have taken another of those out of the archives if they were short of images, but I think what _really_ happened was that Verizon's ad agency called up and demanded that the editor get in line.

IMHO, this wa a hatchet job, and I've seen this before. I was on a picket line at Dedham, Massachusetts, and a photographer from the local rag came by and asked us all to line up, and then said he was looking for a "perfect angle" while he snapped away. The photograph that the paper ran showed one of the picketers using the pay phone, which was the shot the photographer had come for: anytime the big money boys want to belittle and taunt common men, they do it by finding an exception and holding it up so that the masses think it's the norm.

Remember that you are not a newspaper's customer: you are its product. Your willingness to believe what a publication tells you and shows you is a valuable commodity which is sold to the highest bidder.

Bill Horne Moderator

I, of course, have no idea what happened in the newsroom of The Inquirer, so I can only guess.

Bill, by "previous editions", do you mean last week or last decade? If you mean last week then I suppose we could follow the money: Verizon buys a lot of ad space in Philly newspapers, someone calls encouraging use of a photo, etc. It could happen.

If you mean last decade then I think Wes' observation holds true. Newsrooms are cut to the bone. It's easier to use a wire photo or a stock photo in place of sending an actual photographer out. I'm something of an airplane geek and it just floors me to read an article about an American Airlines 767 and see a picture of an old (obviously) Eastern Airlines 727 as if it has anything to do with the article. Someone in the newsroom probably did a search for "airplane" and picked the first thing that came up and called it a day.

John

-- John Mayson Austin, Texas, USA

***** Moderator's Note *****

I meant "in the past few days". I did a Google image search for '"Striking workers" Philadelphia Verizon', and I received dozens of images showing workers striking against Verizon on picket lines in Philadelphia, and many, if not most, were from the Inquirer!

The Philadelphia Inquirer did its reader a disservice: if a picture is worth a thousand words, I'd like to send an image of Google headquarters to the owners, with a caption stating "THIS is why you're so desperate that you would compromise nearly two-hundred years of reader trust, and you brought it on yourselves".

Bill Horne Moderator

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required