Re: FCC's 911 Move a Trojan Horse? Critics Charge Engineering

I believe the issue is that even once you activate it, you wouldn't

> get connected to real E911 services. The LECs didn't provide them > with the proper access to the E911 infrastructure, so Vonage was > forwarding 911 to administrative offices rather than 911 operators.

If you read "The LECs didn't provide them with" as "Vonage wasn't willing to pay for, and thus didn't receive", you'd be about right.

As has been repeatedly noted here and elsewhere, there are other, more responsible, VoIP carriers -- e.g. the cable companies' in-house telcos, or Packet8 -- who chose the more responsible, if perhaps less satisfying to shareholders, tack of paying their share of the costs of maintaining the E911 infrastructure rather than playing public- relations and political games as Vonage did instead.

Thor Lancelot Simon snipped-for-privacy@rek.tjls.com

"The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to be abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." - Noam Chomsky

Reply to
Thor Lancelot Simon
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.