Re: Cingular - AT&T ?

What I don't understand is that I thought the old AT&T cellular

> carrier didn't have such a great reputation, but Cingular did.

Right. AT&T spun off quite a lot of "we don't care, we don't have to" into ATTWS.

Given that, and as you say all the branding work, I don't see how > renaming Cingular into "at&t" makes sense.

Seems pretty stupid to me, too. I expect they think there will long term benefits in giving the whole company the same name.

While we're on the subject, after divesture whatever happened to Bell > Canada and Cincinnatti Bell, of which I believe AT&T didn't own very > much.

It's been a long time since AT&T owned any of Bell Canada. It's quite healthy, and remains the dominant telco in eastern Canada. Their holding comapny BCE has bought a variety of other stuff, notably the Globe and Mail which is Canada's largest newspaper.

After unhooking itself from AT&T, Cinci Bell made the same mistake as Qwest, diving into the long distance market and calling itself Broadwing, and learned the same lesson as Qwest, there's only a financial black hole there. They spat Broadwing back out and are now back to being a profitable regional ILEC with all the usual services including mobile telephony and DSL.



Reply to
John Levine
Loading thread data ... Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.