Re: Bias, Sabotage Haunt Wikipedia's Free World

In five years, Wikipedia has amassed a mountain of impressive

> articles, written by thousands of anonymous contributors. But the dark > side of that freedom is that Wikipedia's articles are becoming > battlegrounds, pitting writers with biased viewpoints and vandals > trying to sabotage entries against a volunteer band of 'Wikipedians' > who constantly seek to set the record straight.

Some of those individuals in the "volunteer band" themselves have political axes to grind, as I observed with the biographies of two foreign politicians in different parties. One of the two resigned in disgrace; the other is still in office.

The "volunteer band" member is in the political party of the disgraced politician. He removes important text related to the actions of the disgraced politician as being a "minor incident", yet has spurious text about how the party is getting away from the shadow of that individual (he can't get away with the fact that the politician left office as perhaps the most unpopular person ever). He also has written copious amounts of highly-critical text about the in-office politician; and has glossed over why he got re-elected.

I decided that it wasn't worth fighting.

-- Mark --

formatting link
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.

Reply to
Mark Crispin
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.