Brinks Alarms: Beware of the Fuel Surcharge Tax

Jul 18, 2008 7 Replies
Brinks Alarms: Beware of the Fuel Surcharge Tax open original image

I like to inform consumers when I feel they are being wronged. A run-in with Brinks leads me to believe that I am not alone in my 2 thoughts....



I recently had a problem with my Brinks alarm. I was trying to test the system and realized I didn't have a live connection with the monitoring group. For those not familiar with the Brinks alarm system (or don't currently own an alarm that is monitored), your are expected by Brinks to "test" your alarm once a month. This is done by asking the system to send a signal to the central server to ensure the unit is performing correctly (verifying a live signal) and then sending a counter-signal back to the device to let the user know (with a loud beep) that a successful connection was made. After repeated tries, I decided to call Brinks to get help with this problem.



We purchased through Brinks because we wanted a reputable company. We were assured of their great technology and years of expertise in residential service. We were also assured of their no-hassle technical service should we have a problem with our system at any point. Imagine my surprise when I asked for a technician to come out and Brinks hesitated. They first asked if I had a digital phone. I told them I did but it was in place before I had the system put in (which I was told at the time wouldn't be a problem). They repeatedly stressed that their system has problems with digital phones (monitoring requires a connection via the telephone line). They (Brinks) wanted to let me know that a charge would be made if it the problem wasn't theirs. I told Brinks I didn't care as the phone was well in place before and the system had worked fine for months. What I also found out was technicians only work Mondays to Saturdays and only during work hours. With the exception of a Saturday visit, I would have to take time-off work to be home between the hours of either 9:00am - 12:00am or



1:00pm to 4:00pm. I booked a Friday knowing my wife would be home on one of her days off.

I called later that day to see how things went. My wife told me the technician had come and mentioned that Brinks was having several problems with their systems similar to ours. He ended up fixing the system but then asked my wife for a $5.00 fee to cover the fuel costs for the trip. She paid the fee but knew full well that I would have not endorsed such a cost.



I called Brinks yesterday to examine the plausibility of the cost. Here is Brinks arguments for charging the $5.00 fee:


  • Its a Canadian Law to charge the .00 fuel surcharge.
  • Its Brinks policy.
  • Everyone is charged and has been charged since March of 2007.

Here are my arguments:


  • Firstly, there is no such Canadian Law that asks all services calls for warranty approved work to be charged a .00 surcharge for fuel.
  • The very meaning of the word "surcharge" implies this is a company policy to add an additional cost to its clients, not a Canadian Law demanding such a fee. Also, Brinks constantly referred to this .00 surcharge for fuel as a "Fuel Surcharge Tax", talk about trying to group words together to make the argument.
  • The Protective Service Agreement that I signed with Brinks to enter into this arrangement in section 6. under "Repair Service" does not mention any such surcharge to warranty approved work. There is mention of acts of god, misuse, negligence, fire, but no mention of a surcharge that will accompany a visit where the system is not performing to its designed specifications.

In the end, the Service Call Manager (of course I had it elevated) gave me another number to call to get my credit of $5.00. He said that he would neither agree or disagree with me on this matter as he did not have the authority to change company policy. This in itself is an admission of error on the part of Brinks.



If anyone else has had similar challenges, the number to call is:



1-800-437-3611. They are only open Mon-Fri 8am to 5pm.

Source:

formatting link



Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system Per maggiori informazioni |For more info

formatting link


ith Brinks leads me to believe that I am not alone in my 2 thoughts....

I don't pay fuel surcharges. Neither do I charge my customers fuel surcharges. A few people who've added a surcharge to their bill, I've just not paid it and ..... they don't try to collect it either. I'm sure they will just take if from those who are stupid enough to pay it and forget about the ones who don'tbecause it's not worth losing a customer over. My water delivery company insisted that I pay it and I cancelled and have another water company. He was stupid for insisting. If he would have raised his prices I would have at least considered staying with him. When I got the new company who had slightly higher prices than the old company, I told him why I was leaving the old one and he said don't worry, his price was firm and no surcharges were planned. Smart guy.

I simply have raised my prices.

I really don't get the point of charging a "surcharge"

Like, ...... does anyone believe that the price of gas is going to go down substantially enough so that they'll be able to recind the "surcharge" in the future? So then will "fuel surcharge" become a standard line item on every invoice? Something that can be increased or lowered as the price of gas fluctuates through the years ......? or what?

What's the point? When the price of parts or wire goes up, is it acceptable to add a "wire or parts surcharge" ? How about " increased electric bill surcharge"? Or, "my wife wants a new fur coat, surcharge"? " I need to cover my trip to Las Vegas, surcharge"

Just raise the price! Jeeeeeeeze!

Brinks leads me to believe that I am not alone in my 2 thoughts....

and realized I didn't have a live connection with the monitoring group. For those not familiar with the Brinks alarm system (or don't currently own an alarm that is monitored), your are expected by Brinks to "test" your alarm once a month. This is done by asking the system to send a signal to the central server to ensure the unit is performing correctly (verifying a live signal) and then sending a counter-signal back to the device to let the user know (with a loud beep) that a successful connection was made. After repeated tries, I decided to call Brinks to get help with this problem.

I see where you went wrong.

with Brinks leads me to believe that I am not alone in my 2 thoughts....

system and realized I didn't have a live connection with the monitoring gr= oup. For those not familiar with the Brinks alarm system (or don't currentl= y own an alarm that is monitored), your are expected by Brinks to "test" yo= ur alarm once a month. This is done by asking the system to send a signal t= o the central server to ensure the unit is performing correctly (verifying = a live signal) and then sending a counter-signal back to the device to let = the user know (with a loud beep) that a successful connection was made. Aft= er repeated tries, I decided to call Brinks to get help with this problem.

They try that here in state of pa there in trouble the ag has already warned buisness owners about it.

They try that here in state of pa there in trouble the ag has already warned buisness owners about it.

What was / is the warning?

I know of guys here not calling it a fuel surcharge, but have just increased service calls to cover the amount to hide the name "Fuel Surcharge."

"Hide the name Fuel Surcharge"?

Isn't that called increasing prices because the cost of doing business has gone up?

As I mentioned earlier .... I'm sure no one added a "wire surcharge" when the cost of wire went up. You just increase your prices to reflect the cost of doing business. Ta DAaaaaaa!

:

You can increase your service fee or cost of your product as a cost increase in doing buisness.

I guess the difference is in how intelligent you think your customers are. Some will complain about increased service rates ("Prices are going up AGAIN?!"), but if you tack it on as a "fuel surcharge" they understand (even if they're not happy about it). Others will just recognize it as the euphemism that it is (and still not be happy about it).

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required