Multiple Source IP port numbers

Oct 26, 2005 1 Replies

G'day,



I have recently acquired the responsibility of looking after our router/firewall. One of my first tasks was to set-up and enable Remote Web Workplace. I have got this working after much trial and error, but am not 100% clear on some of what's happening. Below is part of the firewall log detailing a dial-up access attempt from one of our machines to RWW. I do not understand the multiple access records being shown in it for what I believe is a single-user attempt to gain access to the server.



Subsequent to the log records below, there are five successful log records for access through port 4125 on the server (the RWW port). Could somebody explain (the obvious?) to me?


Firewall Log (Rule 1 is for Port 25 (SMTP) requests, Rule 2 for port



443 (HTTPS) requests):


44 Firewall rule match: TCP (W to L, rule:2) XX.10.32.10:3081



192.168.16.2:443 ACCESS FORWARD
45 Firewall rule NOT match: TCP (W to L, rule:1) XX.10.32.10:3081
192.168.16.2:443 CHECK NEXT RULE
46 Firewall rule match: TCP (W to L, rule:2) XX.10.32.10:3080
192.168.16.2:443 ACCESS FORWARD
47 Firewall rule NOT match: TCP (W to L, rule:1) XX.10.32.10:3080
192.168.16.2:443 CHECK NEXT RULE
48 Firewall rule match: TCP (W to L, rule:2) XX.10.32.10:3079
192.168.16.2:443 ACCESS FORWARD
49 Firewall rule NOT match: TCP (W to L, rule:1) XX.10.32.10:3079
192.168.16.2:443 CHECK NEXT RULE
50 Firewall rule match: TCP (W to L, rule:2) XX.10.32.10:3078
192.168.16.2:443 ACCESS FORWARD
51 Firewall rule NOT match: TCP (W to L, rule:1) XX.10.32.10:3078
192.168.16.2:443 CHECK NEXT RULE
52 Firewall rule match: TCP (W to L, rule:2) XX.10.32.10:3077
192.168.16.2:443 ACCESS FORWARD
53 Firewall rule NOT match: TCP (W to L, rule:1) XX.10.32.10:3077
192.168.16.2:443 CHECK NEXT RULE
54 Firewall rule match: TCP (W to L, rule:2) XX.10.32.10:3076
192.168.16.2:443 ACCESS FORWARD
55 Firewall rule NOT match: TCP (W to L, rule:1) XX.10.32.10:3076
192.168.16.2:443 CHECK NEXT RULE


Set-up: Zyxel router connected to Windows 2003 Server.



Cheers.


Perhaps, then it would be a very good idea to hire somebody who already has a deep knowledge with networking and computer security first, until you've learned enough to fulfill the requirements of such a job.

Yours, VB.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required