Load balancing firewalls?

Oct 27, 2005 7 Replies

Hi All,



I'm setting up a dual-ISP setup at home (cable modem and ADSL) and am shopping around a dual-ISP-capable firewall box.



Ideally, I'd like the box to be able to handle:


1) DMZ (at least one zone) because I'll be hooking up a gaming server off of this router


2) Static and Dynamic NAT


3) Load balancing (combining and treating the two ISPs like a single, large data pipe both in and out) for those computers not in the DMZ (that computer is getting a static IP).


4) Web-manageable (not Cisco PIX CLI)



I'm thinking like the Firebox X500 + Fireware Pro or Sonic Wall TZ-170



+SonicOS Upgrade maybe.

I'm open to all ideas; the cheaper, the better.



Thanks, Curtis


Shade bashed at the keyboard and came up with this gem of wisdom in alt.computer.security:

Linux. BSD

I use FreeBSD's ipfw. It is an excellent firewall...

Imhotep

I appreciate the ideas of FreeBSD and Linux, but I'm trying to avoid a CLI.

Interested to hear if you find something that does load balancing in a price range you can live with. Many low to medium firewalls do everything you want except the load balancing.

-Russ.

Better change your mind. I don't know any single person, who is not able to use a CLI but is able to understand much about networking and computer security.

And this conincidence is no fortuity, I bet.

BTW: there are many GUIs and web UIs for netfilter and other free filtering software, too.

Yours, VB.

Those look kind of neat, if they work as advertised. They could be used outside of a "real" firewall potentially.

-Russ.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required