Anything wrong with blocking "new" SYN/ACK packets?

Oct 19, 2007 3 Replies

Hi, just brainstorming here...



I was reading about these "distributed reflective denial of service" attacks (spray a ton of IPs with spoofed syn packets and they all hit the target with syn/ack's) and I was wondering:


  1. Would it not be possible to just block syn/ack packets that have the state: NEW or would a legitimate syn/ack have that state anyway? (By legitimate I mean the box that receives the syn/ack actually sent the first syn)


  1. If its possible to just block those is there any reason why I would NOT want to do that?


I'm just trying to learn and in the process make my little iptables firewall as secure as possible -- even though I doubt anyone will ever try this attack on me ;-)



Thoughts?


Yes (depending on your packet filter, that is).

No.

No.

cu

59cobalt

Cool, well theres one more defense added to my arsenal of iptables rules ;-)

Thanks

you could well try to only allow TCP packets which certain flags and drop the rest instead of the opposite :D

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required