Good point. I know at least .nl had such a provision for the longest time, even while there were taxes on having television and radio receivers. Now that tax is merged with some other tax (forget which), since having a seperate collection body was deemed too expensive.
Somehow my memory told me it was a convention of this or that, but I can't for the life of me find it; it may just be a dutch provision. I still like the principle, though. The flipside is that if some scanner-user finds out about criminal activity he is bound to let the authorities know.
Yes. You'll have to ask someone with radio receiver knowledge for the details (is there a radio amateur in the cha^Wgroup?), but it is possible at least with certain amplified receiver setups. For a short distance, anyway.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
IANAL, but now that you've got me googling anyway, I'd found a definition of this at [gacd]. Being awfully pedant, I don't think this is applicable since there's no agreement to violate.
Then again, I don't think .kr has quite the same wording of applicable laws (being in the korean language and all) so whether there are similar suitable rules I don't know. Looks like an excercise for the OP. :-)
I don't know. The OP claimed it wasn't regulated. My point following the above (which got snipped) was that I believe parts of the action he stated on intending to execute would be an offense on (non-specifically computer technical) grounds anyway. There don't happen to be .kr lawyers around in this froup, do there?
Some people actively don't care: I know of at least one case where someone has _two_ access points; one with wep encryption enabled, and one wide open with a SSID of "TAKEME"[0] and still a working 'net connection behind it. This is not to imply you should do any different from what you do, of course.
[0] Or similar wording. [gacd]