100mb network and 100mb backbone, good bad or indifferent?

Jan 30, 2005 22 Replies

(snip)

Well, traffic demand and traffic allowed are different. If many hosts are able to send somewhere close to 100Mb, the switch will be forced to discard packets. Without flow control there is no way for the switch to slow down the traffic coming in.

On half duplex links, some switches will do flow control by forcing collisions on incoming packets, so at least the sending host knows that the packets aren't getting through.

This problem will only occur when there is enough traffic to more than fill the 100Mb uplink, which should be relatively rare. Maybe a group of machines all trying to backup data to a server at the same time would do it.

Somewhat similar to traffic meters on freeway onramps that limit the rate traffic can enter the freeway to allow the freeway to run faster. People aren't good at doing flow control without an external signal and the threat of a ticket.

-- glen

Ah, OK. The links act as a throttle - which is not the same thing as saying that the clients work "OK" with those slower links. Even if the clients work "OK", they will demand more given the opportunity. The former is a perspective of the user and the latter is the perspective of the applications.

Fred

Fred Marshall wrote: (snip)

The important point being that with 10Mb half duplex links, the sending hosts either can't send faster than the uplink can take the data, or get collisions as flow control.

The data from 10 links of 10Mb/s each should fit into a 100Mb/s uplink, so even full duplex it should be fine.

-- glen

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required