1. Home
  2. Wireless Networking
  3. Receiver sensitivity- Packet Detection v/s Packet capture

Receiver sensitivity- Packet Detection v/s Packet capture

Hello All, There is a notion of "detecting the signal" and "capturing the signal" based on the received signal strength. The packet reception success depends upon the noise on the channel too (SNR). For simplicity of this discussion, let us ignore noise for the time being.

According to the best of my knowledge, the only physical entitiy present(which impacts the discussion) in the data sheet of a wireless receiver is the "receiver sensitivity". If the received signal level is higher than this sensitivity (noise ~= 0), then the receiver is able to successfully receive the packet.

However, in certain research work and simulators, "capture threshold" and "reception threshold" variables are also introduced. Here is the main point of this topic. Are these abstract entities? In a simple scenario where a receiver is placed at some distance from transmitter. Is there a possibility of sensing the packet but not being able to decode it (assume noise ~= 0 again) ? If not, then the whole idea of capture threshold is meaningless. If yes, then why doesnt the wireless cards have it in their specs?

My thinking is that a signal can be captured properly if the demodulation phase succeeds. There is always something on the channel. If the demodulator can figure out the envelope wave (depending on the modulation type), it should be able to demodulate the wave and capture the digital content from the analog signal. Is there a possibility that we detect the envelope wave but still not able to demodulate? (Again assuming noise ~= 0). If this is so, then there can be carrier sensing but incorrect reception. Since the whole envelope wave is sent with the same power, is there any reason of not decoding it after detecting it.

Wlog, I guess we can assume that this effect can be stated even when any noise present on ths channel. There is still capture/detect effect, but now we have to consider SNR ratio instead of just signal strength.

Any pointers to this topic is greatly appreciated. Sorry if the question is very trivial to DSP/communication people! :)

Thanks and Regards, Vinay

Reply to
Vinay
Loading thread data ...

Not really. In Wi-Fi, receiver sensitivity is measured at a specific BER (bit error rate) which implies a specific signal to noise ratio ratio Eb/No.

formatting link
the reference BER is either 10^5 or 10^6.

Signal "capture" is an FM effect that decrees that FM signals over a specific margin (usually 1-2dB) will completely "capture" or cause the lower level signal to disappear. This works with 802.11 1-2 mbits/sec which is pure FM, but not with higher speeds, which include an AM component.

Wrong. The SNR must be above a specific margin or the demodulator will belch garbage (errors). The measurement reference SNR is NOT a good place to operate. At 1 error every 10^5 bits with 512 byte average packets, that's one error every 250 packets, which sucks. With a 10^5 BER, it even worse with one error every 25 packets. + That's what "fade margin" is all about. A minimum fade margin of 20dB is typical, which yields a much better BER for adequate communications.

Neither term has any real meaning to me. I'll guess that reception threshold is acutally minimum detectable signal and capture threshold deals only with FM modulated signals. Neither of these have any EIA or ISO specs for their measurment.

You were right the first time. Receiver threshold is meaningless as it really a measure of how much ambient noise is in the local environment and how much signal it takes to overcome this noise. Not a very useful or reproduceable measurement. Instead of 0dB S/N (which is where the signal equals the noise) a BER reference makes more sense and is reproduceable.

Captured properly? That implies an interfering signal.

What does that mean? Are you making measurements with an antenna connected? If so, you won't get consistent results. The receiver sensitivity should be measured in a pollution free environment with a reproduceable test setup. Ambient RF pollution is not reproduceable.

Yeah, that's what demodulators do. With direct sequence spread spectrum, it's a bit different as there is no analog signal. Most of the common chipsets used today are all digital and use a DSP to provide the necessary digital demodulation without first converting to analog.

Sorry. You lost me.

Again, nobody trys to demodulate a high speed digital signal with 0dB SNR. The higher data rates and more exotic modulation schemes require a much higher SNR. For example, at 11Mbits/sec with CCK modulation, the minimum SNR is about 11dB for a 10^6 SNR. Look at the curve at:

formatting link
are modulation schemes that will work with 0dB SNR, but the thruput isn't anything near as fast as Wi-Fi.

You lost me again.

You most certainly should consider SNR. If insufficient, you get noise on your demodulation output instead of data.

You're probably asking in the wrong newsgroups. I can't tell what you're working on or what you're trying to accomplish to advise as to the proper newsgroup.

Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.