There's no easy escape from cellphone risks

There's no easy escape from cellphone risks

By Hiawatha Bray Globe Staff / June 2, 2011

Forget whether your cellphone technology is 3G or 4G. It's time to start worrying about 2B.

That's the World Health Organization's official designation for chemicals or other agents that may cause cancer in humans. And the radio waves streaming from the world's 5 billion cellphones have just been added to the WHO's 2B list.

The ranking means that using your cellphone may pose about as much cancer risk as eating pickled vegetables or drinking coffee, both substances that are also on the list. Coffee's potential as a carcinogen has not hurt Starbucks' revenues. So don't expect to see pay phones sprouting on street corners as panicked consumers discard their iPhones and BlackBerries.

Still, the threat of brain tumors - no matter how slight - is troubling to WHO scientists. Americans average about 20 minutes of cellphone talk time per day, according to data from CTIA, the cellular industry's trade association.

That doesn't sound like a lot. But researchers were alarmed by a study that found an increased incidence of brain tumors in people who used their cellphones for an average of 30 minutes per day.

...

formatting link

Reply to
Monty Solomon
Loading thread data ...

IARC Classifies Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as Possibly Carcinogenic To Humans

formatting link

EWG rankings of cellphone radiation levels

formatting link

Experts say cellphones are possibly carcinogenic

formatting link

Phones with highest, lowest radiation levels

formatting link

Reply to
Monty Solomon

.........

formatting link
One issue that might arise from these studies is he evolving changes in radiation intensity which must have varied since the beginning of cellphone networks.

In the beginning when there were far fewer base stations than there are now, the handsets must have been forced (on average) to transmit at hight power levels which would have had commensurate increase in any negative effects as outlined in these studies. Nowadays one can make the judgement that with more cell base stations (installed to meet the steadily increased demand) then - overall - handset transmit power should have diminished for a lot of users. There will be many exceptions in less dense service areas, but the general concept should be valid.

The bottom-line may be that the effects - which take a long time to arise

- may be less harmful than a decade or so ago for the same overall time of phone usage with the device next to your skull.

Reply to
David Clayton

Several commentators in the U.S.A. have noted that the possible danger is about the same as the WHO cites for drinking coffee.

Wes Leatherock snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com snipped-for-privacy@aol.com

Reply to
Wes Leatherock

Everyone at Starbooks is using their cell phones while drinking their coffee. We need a study for that reckless behavior. :-)

Reply to
Sam Spade

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.