comp.dcom.telecom readership:
I'd like your help. Perhaps together we can get an infrastructure in place to stop illegal robocalling.
The background:
You may remember that in 2012-2013 the FTC (NOT FCC) held a contest for a way to stop illegal robocalling.
I entered the contest, but did not win. My proposal is technical - I don't think trying to change bad behavior will work.
The summary of my original proposal can be seen at
Because I think the affair needs FCC (not FTC) action, I tried to get people at the FCC to look at my proposal and tell me what's wrong with it. I've been unsuccessful in getting feedback.
So, other pool of expertise is you. What I'd like is for those of you so inclined to look at my entry and critique it. If it turns out it has fatal flaws, so be it, I'll go away quietly. But if there's consensus that it will work, the next step is to gather suggestions as to how to get it implemented. At this moment I would guess that means proposing and advocating new FCC rules, nontrivial as that may be.
Our Moderator, Bill Horne, has kindly posted my entry document on the telecom web site, even while warning me of the difficulty of this task. Be aware before you jump in that it's 15 pages (the FTC contest limit) of fairly small print and technical. Some of you will remember a thread in this newsgroup about this topic; I exploited information in that thread and referenced it in the proposal.
You can access the proposal here:
The main thrust of the proposal is to detect Caller ID spoofing. For your information, the IETF has resurrected its efforts to detect Caller ID spoofing.
Check it out:
Also available at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-stir-problem-statement-03.txt
To summarize, what's needed is
1) critiques of my robocall/caller-ID document 2) advice on how to proceed next if we can agree that it will work.