Re: Spamhuas Thumbs Nose at Eleven Million Dollar Judgment Against It

Sep 18, 2006 0 Replies

Carla K. Johnson AP wrote in :


Loethen said if Spamhaus ignores the ruling "we will seek alternate
> means of enforcing the judgment through the court system in the
> U.S. and potentially the U.K."
> "Spamhaus is thumbing its nose at the U.S. courts by failing to
> participate in the process, failing to provide information in the
> court case, and failing to comply with the orders of the court," > Loethen said.

The views of Spamhaus can be found at

formatting link
with this gem as last paragraph:


"A TRO, and indeed any ruling whatsoever issued by a United States County, State or Federal Court has no validity in the United Kingdom unless jurisdiction is proven to a British Court. Therefore Spamhaus correctly ignored the TRO and advises Mr. Linhardt to re-file his case in a British court when he can prove jurisdiction, but advises Mr. Linhardt that British courts do not accept US-style 'SLAPP' suits and impose penalties for lying to the court."


snipped-for-privacy@kzdoos.xsall.nl or RSA/1024 0xCA845CB5 -?) Fax +31-30-2817051 Camp Wireless, wireless Internet access /\\\\

formatting link
at campsites
formatting link
_\\_V

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required