Re: Spamhuas Thumbs Nose at Eleven Million Dollar Judgment Against It

Carla K. Johnson AP wrote in :

Loethen said if Spamhaus ignores the ruling "we will seek alternate > means of enforcing the judgment through the court system in the > U.S. and potentially the U.K." > "Spamhaus is thumbing its nose at the U.S. courts by failing to > participate in the process, failing to provide information in the > court case, and failing to comply with the orders of the court," > Loethen said.

The views of Spamhaus can be found at

formatting link
with this gem as last paragraph:

"A TRO, and indeed any ruling whatsoever issued by a United States County, State or Federal Court has no validity in the United Kingdom unless jurisdiction is proven to a British Court. Therefore Spamhaus correctly ignored the TRO and advises Mr. Linhardt to re-file his case in a British court when he can prove jurisdiction, but advises Mr. Linhardt that British courts do not accept US-style 'SLAPP' suits and impose penalties for lying to the court."

snipped-for-privacy@kzdoos.xsall.nl or RSA/1024 0xCA845CB5 -?) Fax +31-30-2817051 Camp Wireless, wireless Internet access /\\\\

formatting link
at campsites
formatting link
_\\_V

Reply to
Koos van den Hout
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.