Whereupon John McHarry responded:
Whom do you mean by "they" in that last sentence? Are you implying that Miss Utility is responsible for marking the line?
Miss Utility is not responsible for marking the line. Miss Utility is a "one-call" notification center: it answers calls from excavators (contractors, homeowners, landscapers, etc.) and relays that information (by e-mail, fax, or telephone call) to all owners of underground facilities in the affected area. The owners of the facilities are then responsible for actually marking the line, either by sending out their own personnel, or by contracting with a commercial locating service.
By making a single call to one-call, an excavator can legally notify every facility owner in the affected area without having to figure out what's there and who owns it.
Similar one-call centers exist in every state, although they go by a variety of names (Blue Stakes in Utah; Diggers Hotline in Wisconsin; Miss Dig in Michigan; JULIE in Illinois).
McHarry continued:
If Verizon and/or the power company could legally prove that the cable TV company's contractor was at fault -- AND that their own facilities were in 100% compliance with all applicable laws -- I'd guess that the cable company's contractor's insurance company had to pay up.
By the same token, if CableOne can legally prove that the clumsy contractor was at fault -- AND that CableOne's own facilities were in
100% compliance with all applicable laws -- clumsy contractor will indeed get a huge repair bill.The phrase "100% compliance with all applicable laws" means:
- The facility owner must have clear legal right (by franchise, recorded permit, recorded easement, or ownership) to occupy the underlying land.
- The facility must have been installed in compliance with the National Electrical Code, the National Electrical Safety Code, state law, and local ordinances.
- The facility owner must have accurately located and marked (and remarked, if requested) the facility within the specified time limit after receiving one-call notification.
A few inches can make a big difference in cases like this. If an underground cable was only 23 inches deep, a defendant's lawyer can assert that the cable's owner was in violation of the NESC. If an underground cable was one inch on the wrong side of a property line, a defendant's lawyer can assert that the cable's owner didn't have legal right to occupy the land. If locate marks (paint and/or flags) were a few inches out of line, a defendant's lawyer can assert that the cable wasn't marked properly.
Of course, as you note, damage repairs destroy the evidence. Which is why you'll sometimes see repair crews (or their insurance adjusters) documenting the situation (taking photographs and making sketches) before repairs begin.
And why one-call centers record, and time/date stamp, every call.
Neal McLain