The Bell System history tells that they recognized the traffic of big
> cities would not fit on Step-by-Step switching because of the switch's
> limited decimal choices. Panel switching was developed to give more
> flexibility and choices in city service.
> However, Los Angeles remained Step by step because the Bell System
> inherited existing exchanges. The history says despite things like
> graded multiples network mgmt in LA proved difficult, but they did not > elaborate.
> I know Bell Labs developed SxS add-ons in the 1960s and 1970s to
> improve SxS functionality, but that was much later. An early short
> haul toll itemized message accounting system was developed for LA.
> As Los Angeles turned into a big city (1950s?), how did the Bell
> System handle inter-exchange traffic within the limits of an SxS
> switch? Did they rely on tandems? Did they have to overtrunk at high
> expense? Did they put in No 5 Crossbar when it came out?
> [public replies, please]
I believe they started using digit absorbing switches and directors which did translations, so say you dialed a short hall number it would drop back into the local switch, or to a trunk for another office, if it were long distance it might go to a tandem. They as GTE did would rearrange trunking for what was called the busy season.
The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2005 I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot in Hell Co.