One thing on which economists agree is that subsidies are
> "deadweight losses," i.e., pure inefficiency. Whenever you pay
> somebody to do something that isn't capable of paying its own way,
> you are wasting your own resources and getting him to waste his.
> There are rare exceptions, but even then, it's better to fix
> whatever is stopping the market from working normally,
> rather than counteract it with a subsidy.
There is no public passenger trasnportation anywhere in the world that is not subsidized--bus, air, rail, subway, light rail. The market is working properly. There is no demand for public passnger transportation at market prices...those which would have to be charged if there were no subsidy.
Wes Leatherock snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com snipped-for-privacy@aol.com