Re: Companies Subvert Search Results to Squelch Criticism

If they don't like what Quixtar is doing, they should change their > software.

> ob googlewhack: billabong microstepping > [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: But Google's claim would be they > were fraudulently induced to create false results. It would be > something akin to postal fraud (but not with the same legal > ramifications): To commit 'postal fraud' one does not need to > physically put a fraudulent item in the mail; inducing someone > else to do so is likewise fraud _on your part_. So you induced > Google, in this instance, to draw up and present false or > fraudulent search results.

But how are these results "fraudulent" or "false"?

It is up to Google to define its results, and the software they use to achieve them. If Google

a) had a contract with another party to develop search engine software; b) that contract said that the results should not be influenced by Quixtar's (or any similar) actions; and c) the results were in fact so influenced

then Google might have a cause of action against that company - but if they themselves develop the software, they cannot claim fraud if the software does exactly what they design it to do. There is no party (except themselves) that has injured them.

Businesses make badly designed products all the time; and when the defects come to light it is there job to make them better, not to complain that the completely legal actions of others are to blame.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Yes, the software does what it was designed to do, just like credit card processing does what it is supposed to do. But if you were (in this instance at least) a bit smarter than Google, or the credit card people and caused something to happen by employing fraud, then the law, which is theoretically always intended to protect the weak against the strong will side with Google (or the credit card people). PAT]
Reply to
jtaylor
Loading thread data ...

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.