For Funerals Too Far, Mourners Gather on the Web [telecom]

For Funerals Too Far, Mourners Gather on the Web

By LAURA M. HOLSON The New York Times January 24, 2011

In an age of commemorating birthdays, weddings and anniversaries on Facebook and Twitter, it was perhaps inevitable that live Web-streaming funerals for friends and loved ones would be next.

It is no surprise that the deaths of celebrities, like Michael Jackson, or honored political figures, like the United States diplomat Richard Holbrooke, are promoted as international Web events. So, too, was the memorial service for the six people killed Jan. 8 in Tucson, which had thousands of viewers on the Web.

But now the once-private funerals and memorials of less-noted citizens are also going online.

Several software companies have created easy-to-use programs to help funeral homes cater to bereaved families. FuneralOne a one-stop shop for online memorials that is based in St. Clair, Mich., has seen the number of funeral homes offering Webcasts increase to 1,053 in 2010, from 126 in 2008 (it also sells digital tribute DVDs).

During that same period, Event by Wire, a competitor in Half Moon Bay, Calif., watched the number of funeral homes live-streaming services jump to 300 from 80. And this month, the Service Corporation International in Houston, which owns 2,000 funeral homes and cemeteries, including the venerable Frank E. Campbell funeral chapel on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, said it was conducting a pilot Webcasting program at 16 of its funeral homes.

Traveling to funerals was once an important family rite, but with greater secularity and a mobile population increasingly disconnected from original hometowns, watching a funeral online can seem better than not going to a funeral at all. Social media, too, have redrawn the communal barriers of what is acceptable when relating to parents, siblings, friends and acquaintances.

...

formatting link

Reply to
Monty Solomon
Loading thread data ...

Not to mention one less exposure to the abusive TSA and airlines, not to mention the personal safety risks of being near, or in, airport terminal buildings.

Reply to
Sam Spade

This sort of thing is nothing new. The old Bell System was working to provide this kind of remote service in the 1960s for various applications, though I'm not sure if they had funerals in mind.

There was a special telephone set designed for homebound students to listen in on classwork in school.

Bell invested a great deal of money in developing Picturephone, figuring out the telephone set itself (it had several generations), transmission issues, and switching issues. It probably was an idea ahead of its time, given now how people are using their own webcams and specialty services like Skype for that sort of thing.

When Picturephone didn't take off, Bell attempted to provide a video conferencing service by establishing video-conference rooms (essentially a mini-TV studio) in various cities. Business people could rent use of the rooms in various locations for tele- conferencing. I don't know how successful the service was, but I think it was better received and far more cost effective than individual Picturephone sets.

Reply to
Lisa or Jeff

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.