I don't drink. Anyway, you wrote the post in question. I don't know why I bother, but it's the principle of the matter now. You wrote it, and you're lying about it. I would call out anybody who lies (ask your buddy in FL) here, and you're it.
So....
Maybe someone else will step in and prove me wrong, but we both know that's not happening because I'm right.
I don't know why you bother either, must be the booze
No it's not happening because nobody else is interested
Again, I don't drink.
Probably. I'm barely interested myself. I just thought it's amazing that you continue to deny something that has been proven with irrefutable evidence.
Back in the day, if the target was 'you-know-who', this incident would be tantamount to the Kennedy assassination/conspiracy.
Maybe because it hasn't been proven with irrefutable evidence, I've dealt with several of the ITI version recessed sensors when they first came out so I doubt I'd ever ask someone else how well they work.
You seem more than barely interested
And if I recall you and Frank were at the head of the pack at that kind of stuff
Okay then, what explanation do you have for the post in question? Is it a very well done forgery?
I am more interested in the thought process a person like you has. It's hard to imagine someone blatantly lying & denying while faced with hard evidence. It's mostly curiosity regarding the psychology behind your deception, not the content of the lie itself.
Yeah.
Fingerprints on a murder weapon is hard evidence Your DNA on a dead body is hard evidence
A copied text file or link to a web post isn't hard evidence, if you really want to examine bizarre thought processes start with your own
At least we agree on that
We're not talking about murder, please stay focused.
It is when we are talking about the authenticity of a Usenet post. There never will be DNA evidence, Mark.
Somewhat, yes. I just don't want to deviate from the matter at hand just yet.
So, tell me your theory as to how that message with your name and header properties all over it showed up please....
Sure, my theory is someone else wrote it and it was included along with the rest of someone's post that I replied to. I should think to most people that be common sense.
BTW Who is helping you will all those big words you typed?
Nope. The text in question was not quoted text. Try again.
Which words would you like help with?
Don't you think it's a little odd that all this bothers you so much?
Yes, it's more than a little odd.
So, just admit you posted it and I can move on.
LOL! uh NO
Here are two more sites that archived that post of yours:
They made it up too, it's a conspiracy
Who do you think is conspiring to get you? Frank?
Frank isn't that smart so it has to be you
It is not me, I'm the one investigating it. Why you gotta be such a hater on Frank?
I'm better looking in shorts.
I never said I hated Frank, it's just that you are obviously smarter than he is
Maybe so, maybe not... Flattery will not work.
You wrote the post, then realized you answered your own question, then cancelled it with GoogleGroups. It's an honest mistake, but lying about it is not honest at all.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required