Cell Phone Jammers are Illegal in USA

nick markowitz · 2009-05-09T00:19:17+00:00

June 9, 2005VIA CERTIFIED MAILRETURN RECEIPT REQUESTEDShaker Hassan,Sales Manager, Grand Trades Co.4701 15th Avenue, N.E.Apartment 108Seattle, WA 98105Re: File No. EB-05-SE-059Dear Shaker Hassan:This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) ofthe Communications Act of 1934, as amended (=93Communications Act=94), 47U.S.C. =A7 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devicesin the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of theCommunications Act, 47 U.S.C. =A7 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of theCommission=92s Rules (=93Rules=94), 47 C.F.R. =A7 2.803(a). As explainedbelow, future violations of the Commission=92s rules in this regard maysubject your company to monetary forfeitures.By letter dated March 15, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ofthe Commission=92s Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation intowhether Grand Trades Co. (=93Grand Trades=94) is marketing in the UnitedStates unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, cell phonejammers, wireless device jammers and long range cordless telephones.At the time of that letter, March 15, 2005, we observed on yourwebsite, your advertisement for sale of thefollowing radio frequency devices:1. SH-066BM2 A/B-R cell phone jammer. The website indicated that therewere two models of this device available, including one for =93USA/Canada.=942. SH066PL2A/B portable cell phone jammer. The website indicated thatthere were two models of this device available, including one for =93USA/Canada.=943. GT-200 cell phone jammer. The website indicated that there were twomodels of this device available, including one for =93USA/Canada.=944. SRC300 cell phone jammer. The website indicated that there were twomodels of this device available, including one for =93USA/Canada.=945. GT300 cell phone jammer. The website described this device as a=93Worldwide=94 cell phone jammer.6. 2.4 GHz wireless jammer. The website stated that this deviceinterferes with the video signals of wireless...

May 09, 2009 40 Replies

Rate this thread:

Robert L Bass 17 years ago

I'll grant you that for sure. Maybe if Monica had worked for FEMA he'd have paid better attention.

Vote

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required