"connection timed out" problem

Apr 01, 2006 26 Replies

Replying for both Moe (dig the ID, btw) and Sebastian.

Thanks again for all your help.

OK...my old modem is a USR Sporster 56k external on the com port. Runs like a champ. I've had it for about 7 years or so.

The new modem is a USR 56K USB.

I had bought the new one for the faster upload speeds for updating my websites.

On both modems, they typically want to connect at 49.2, sometimes higher. But I was getting dropped about 1/3rd of the time. This happened on the old machine as well.

The old modem has the commands to set max and min connect speeds. Right now I have it limited to 45.2 and I don't get dropped as often, if at all. It does retrain once in a while. I can tell when RD/SD are low when there should be stuff moving. Only takes a few seconds to retrain. I can live with that as long as it's not actually dropping the connection.

The new modem does not have those commands so therefore it always connects at a high speed, and eventually I'd lose it.

As for the DSL, when I tried to get it but couldn't get sync, they came out and checked the line. Turned out I am something like 24,000 feet from the switch. I was told it typically tops out at 17-18K feet. They couldn't but barely get a signal at the J-box down the road which was supposed to be at about 21K feet. I was told they are working on a new system that can go further, but no telling when it would be available.

S*it, I just wish I could have a fiber optic right to the CPU. :)

Brian

Skywise wrote in news:122ujs4erqgrd68 @corp.supernews.com:

Backtracking on this for a sec, I had an opportunity to check a different W2k machine I had built previously for someone. It doesn't even have the above key. I presume then that the system would just use the default value?

I wonder now if this key on my system was put in by something I installed and it made the bad choice of setting the value to zero.

Brina

Yes, you can open the registry files with registry editor.

Yours, VB.

Built like a tank - gets the same mileage. ;-)

In both cases, they really do have specific model numbers. The first one is probably a 5686-03, or a 5605. Not sure about the new one - my understanding is that they are all using the same Texas Instrument chip sets.

AT&Nxx and AT&Uxx which you can see using the 'AT$' and 'AT&$' commands.

Did you check using the $ commands?

I'm just about 21000 feet. It only took four years to get it here. The company line is still a dedicated POTS line.

Fiber is available in a few markets on the East Coast, at some significant cost. I haven't heard that much about it one way or the other. Your other option would be to move into the "down town data center" - which may not be the most desirable thing.

Old guy

snipped-for-privacy@painkiller.example.tld (Moe Trin) wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@compton.phx.az.us:

5686-04. The new one is a 5633A.

I much prefer the older one. A bit slower on uploads. A small price to pay for the ability to control the damned modem.

Believe it or not, the new modem doesn't even support $ commands!!!

I had to rely on the published command list in the docs. Even so, I tried the &N &U commands anyway but got errors.

Brian

Skywise wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@corp.supernews.com:

Man, you're riding a dial-up connection. No wonder your pages are timing out! F*ck, get a life.

ChronJob wrote in news:Xns9A00A35289FFchronjob888@

69.28.186.158:

Whose the one with no life? You're the one replying to a post made 20 months ago!!!

Brian

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required