First off, I'm not a network person, I'm just taking a course, but my background is wireless communications, so I'm more famliar with Aloha than Ethernet.
At any rate, I'm having a debate with someone over the behaviour of the contention algorithm and I'm wondering if anyone has a way to break the tie (with some balck and white proof).
Question:
Take a 4 users network (A,B,C and D). A and B send and collide, they then sit back and wait for their timers to go off to try again. C and D then send and collide, they too set their timers and wait to try again.
Point of Contention:
Do both A and B detect the collision of C and D, and if so, are they then forced to reset their timers?
My view point is No, and here are my reasoning. Technically I think they could detect the collision of C and D, but if this is the case, then why do transmitters need the loopback of the Tx signal to the Rx to compare what's Rx's if anyone (i.e. A or B) can detect the collision?
Any literature I've found so far only deals with the transmitter and receiver, none specifically detail the requirements of the passive terminal. Another reason why I don't think this is the case as I would expect it explicitly written that ALL terminals must reset their timers.
Thanks, Darren