Radware

In article , FX wrote: :I had worked on Radware devices like Web server director (WSD), Link :proof (LP) and CT100 and found that these boxes provide features that :cisco devices dont provide like load balancing(based upon proximity, :time delays, link health, network load, no of sessions, etc), :Application based filtering (L4-L7 policies) like language etc. + 1000s :of features :I found these devices quiet usefuland had implemented among some :topmost companies in INDIA. :Why doesnt cisco manufacture such devices? :wats ur opinion?

My opinion? That it is due to Patent issues. Radware likely patented the relevant technologies.

I do not have any kind of proof to provide, but the great thing about opinions (even on technical matters) is that opinions don't need proof (or even rationality.)