Cisco Wireless - Client hidden from each other possible ?

Jul 13, 2006 5 Replies

Hi All,


We are using Cisco wireless access points, we would like for the associated clients to not to be able to see each other, is this possible? The solution is wireless internet access for an office block with many businesses. But we don't want company 1 from seeing company 2. we thought VLANS but we also need DHCP to work for each client computer. We can if needed buy additional Cisco hardware to do this if needed.


Can the access point do this somehow? Does anyone have any ideas?


Many thanks for you time,


corbett at postmaster dot co dot uk


Craig.


check out protect port command on bridge group

bridge-group port-protected

Merv schrieb:

This works only between clients on a single AP. A client associated to AP1 can always reach a wireless station associated to AP2 because both APs bridge the traffic between different interfaces in the bridge group, even if "port-protected".

If you want to separate traffic from different business you'll may want a VLAN setup.

you'll may want

VLAN yes we have looked, but we cannot setup DHCP on the AP per VLAN

You can definitely do this if you have a WLAN controller, like a 4402. Makes it very easy to setup AP's and WLANs (Wireless LANs).

Scott

~ Merv schrieb: ~ > check out protect port command on bridge group ~ > ~ > bridge-group ~ > port-protected ~ > ~ ~ This works only between clients on a single AP. ~ A client associated to AP1 can always reach a wireless station ~ associated to AP2 because both APs bridge the traffic between different ~ interfaces in the bridge group, even if "port-protected". ~ ~ If you want to separate traffic from different business you'll may want ~ a VLAN setup.

I'd recommend crafting ACLs. I.e. on each access point's radio interface, have the following input access lists:

bridge ACL: forbid all non-IP packets

IP ACL: permit IP packets sourced from 0.0.0.0 port bootpc forbid IP packets sourced from anything but the client range forbid IP packets sourced from the client range and addressed to the client range block MS junk

stuff like that ...

[the above is not tested by me]

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required