Cisco 3260 - Ran out of address?

Hi,

I have an Internet router (c3260) and for some reason users are not able to get any ip's off of it anymore. I suspect that I need to increase the dhcp pool, but thought that I run this by you guys and see what comes up....

! version 12.1 no service single-slot-reload-enable service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime show-timezone service timestamps log datetime msec localtime show-timezone service password-encryption ! hostname InternetRouter ! logging buffered 8192 informational ! ! ! ! ! clock timezone CST -6 clock summer-time CDT recurring ip subnet-zero no ip source-route ip name-server 204.x.x.10 ip name-server 199.x.x.10 ip name-server 204.x.x.10 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.50 ! ip dhcp pool dhcp-pool network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 domain-name sprint.net dns-server 204.x.x.10 199.x.x.10 default-router 192.168.1.1 lease 365 ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ! interface Null0 no ip unreachables ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip verify unicast reverse-path no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ip nat inside ip route-cache flow no ip mroute-cache half-duplex no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 144.x.x.182 255.255.255.252 ip access-group 101 in ip verify unicast reverse-path no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp ip nat outside rate-limit output access-group 105 1536000 512000 786000 conform- action transmit exceed-action drop no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache no cdp enable ! ip nat translation port-timeout tcp 500 never ip nat inside source list 1 interface Serial0/0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 144.x.x.181 ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 Null0 no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 101 deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any log access-list 101 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any log access-list 101 permit ip any any access-list 105 permit icmp any any echo-reply log no cdp run ! end

Reply to
Sarastra Maya
Loading thread data ...

First thing, why do you want the length of the lease to be 365 days??? Second, you can do a "sh ip dchp bind" to see what ip are being used.

Doan

Reply to
Doan

Why 365? Because this router is strictly for Internet access (bypassing proxies), for better reasons, some users "work" aren't too kin on proxies. show ip dhcp binding - I did see a lot of binding going on there. I would assume that is the reason why you won't recommend keeping the lease for that long. So, I cleared the binding on the dhcp: clear ip dhcp binding *.

And that seems to fix it. Although, I highly doubt that this problem will go away forever. Thus, back to my initial question..........Does increasing the pool help in this situation?

Reply to
Sarastra Maya

How many users are you supporting?

BTW, instead of leasing for 365 days, why not just assign static ip's?

Doan

Reply to
Doan

Okay. I did some requirements gathering and it turns out that I DID NOT need 365 days lease. So, reducing that to about every 30 days work out just fine.

I guess I was over analyzing/troubleshooting this simple issue.

:) Thanks guys!

Reply to
Sarastra Maya

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.