Cisco 1721 as PPTP Client

Nov 20, 2006 29 Replies

In article , snipped-for-privacy@inwind.it (Elia Spadoni) writes: | Same as before

Possibly the route map isn't doing what I expected. You could try enabling debugging for it ("debug ip policy" I think). You could also try replacing the "set interface ATM0.35" in the route map with "set ip next-hop 89.186.68.5". I assumed that the interface version would work with a point-to-point pvc, but I've never tried this with ATM before...

| have i to enable keepalives?

I would turn them back on. In general, don't change more than one thing at a time.

| and what about nat?

I would disable NAT until you have the vpn working. At least get rid of the "ip nat outside" on the ATM.35 interface; I would worry that it is translating the encapsulted PPTP packets.

Dan Lanciani ddl@danlan.*com

I tried putting next hop, but with no changes.

Enabled. But I did not find any entries in the syslog regarding keepalives ::)

okok :)

Now this evening I experienced very fast disconnections. Nothing better happened. Do you have a msn contact so we could make some test online? Do you think that the problems seems related to policy routing?

Please now copy from the last msg, the config of the router.

We are almost there to the solution... :P The problems as you noticed could be related to policy routing but I tried to see on the cisco website about policy routing but I never experienced that on my works and I am not very "trained" on that.

What could we do now?

As you see, keepalives again

here is the detail

30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322325: 322266: Nov 30 01:51:48.941 CET: Vi1 PPP: Queue CCP code[1] id[1] 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322326: 322267: Nov 30 01:51:48.945 CET: Vi1 PPP SSS: Receive SSS-Mgr Connect-Local 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322327: 322268: Nov 30 01:51:48.945 CET: Vi1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Finish LCP 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322328: 322269: Nov 30 01:51:48.949 CET: Vi1 PPP: Phase is UP 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322329: 322270: Nov 30 01:51:48.949 CET: Vi1 IPCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 1 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322330: 322271: Nov 30 01:51:48.949 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000) 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322331: 322272: Nov 30 01:51:48.949 CET: Vi1 CCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 1 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322332: 322273: Nov 30 01:51:48.949 CET: Vi1 CCP: MS-PPC supported bits 0x01000060 (0x120601000060) 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322333: 322274: Nov 30 01:51:48.949 CET: Vi1 PPP: Process pending ncp packets 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322334: 322275: Nov 30 01:51:48.953 CET: Vi1 CCP: Redirect packet to Vi1 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322335: 322276: Nov 30 01:51:48.953 CET: Vi1 CCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322336: 322277: Nov 30 01:51:48.953 CET: Vi1 CCP: MS-PPC supported bits 0x01000040 (0x120601000040) 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322337: 322278: Nov 30 01:51:48.953 CET: Vi1 CCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 1 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322338: 322279: Nov 30 01:51:48.953 CET: Vi1 CCP: MS-PPC supported bits 0x01000040 (0x120601000040) 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322339: 322280: Nov 30 01:51:49.009 CET: Vi1 IPCP: I TERMACK [REQsent] id 1 len 4 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322340: 322281: Nov 30 01:51:49.013 CET: Vi1 CCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 1 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322341: 322282: Nov 30 01:51:49.013 CET: Vi1 CCP: MS-PPC supported bits 0x01000040 (0x120601000040) 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322342: 322283: Nov 30 01:51:49.013 CET: Vi1 CCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 2 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322343: 322284: Nov 30 01:51:49.013 CET: Vi1 CCP: MS-PPC supported bits 0x01000040 (0x120601000040) 30-11-2006 00:52:24 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322344: 322285: Nov 30 01:51:49.073 CET: Vi1 CCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 2 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:25 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322345: 322286: Nov 30 01:51:49.073 CET: Vi1 CCP: MS-PPC supported bits 0x01000040 (0x120601000040) 30-11-2006 00:52:25 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322346: 322287: Nov 30 01:51:49.073 CET: Vi1 CCP: State is Open 30-11-2006 00:52:25 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322347: 322288: Nov 30 01:51:49.081 CET: Vi1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:25 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322348: 322289: Nov 30 01:51:49.081 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Address 83.233.168.2 (0x030653E9A802) 30-11-2006 00:52:25 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322349: 322290: Nov 30 01:51:49.081 CET: Vi1 IPCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 1 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:25 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322350: 322291: Nov 30 01:51:49.081 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Address 83.233.168.2 (0x030653E9A802) 30-11-2006 00:52:26 Syslog.Notice 192.168.1.254 322351: 322292: Nov 30 01:51:49.945 CET: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to up 30-11-2006 00:52:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322352: 322293: Nov 30 01:51:50.961 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Timeout: State ACKsent 30-11-2006 00:52:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322353: 322294: Nov 30 01:51:50.961 CET: Vi1 IPCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 2 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322354: 322295: Nov 30 01:51:50.961 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000) 30-11-2006 00:52:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322355: 322296: Nov 30 01:51:51.017 CET: Vi1 IPCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 2 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322356: 322297: Nov 30 01:51:51.017 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Address 83.233.168.96 (0x030653E9A860) 30-11-2006 00:52:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322357: 322298: Nov 30 01:51:51.021 CET: Vi1 IPCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 3 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322358: 322299: Nov 30 01:51:51.021 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Address 83.233.168.96 (0x030653E9A860) 30-11-2006 00:52:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322359: 322300: Nov 30 01:51:51.077 CET: Vi1 IPCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 3 len 10 30-11-2006 00:52:27 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322360: 322301: Nov 30 01:51:51.077 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Address 83.233.168.96 (0x030653E9A860) 30-11-2006 00:52:27 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322361: 322302: Nov 30 01:51:51.077 CET: Vi1 IPCP: State is Open 30-11-2006 00:52:27 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322362: 322303: Nov 30 01:51:51.081 CET: Di0 IPCP: Install negotiated IP interface address 83.233.168.96 30-11-2006 00:52:27 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322363: 322304: Nov 30 01:51:51.085 CET: Di0 IPCP: Install route to 83.233.168.2 30-11-2006 00:52:27 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322364: 322305: Nov 30 01:51:51.089 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Add link info for cef entry 83.233.168.2 30-11-2006 00:53:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322365: 322306: Nov 30 01:52:51.410 CET: Vi1 PPP: Missed 5 keepalives, taking LCP down 30-11-2006 00:53:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322366: 322307: Nov 30 01:52:51.410 CET: Vi1 PPP: Sending Acct Event[Down] id[88] 30-11-2006 00:53:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322367: 322308: Nov 30 01:52:51.410 CET: Vi1 LCP: State is Closed 30-11-2006 00:53:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322368: 322309: Nov 30 01:52:51.410 CET: Vi1 PPP: Phase is DOWN 30-11-2006 00:53:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322369: 322310: Nov 30 01:52:51.410 CET: Vi1 CCP: State is Closed 30-11-2006 00:53:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322370: 322311: Nov 30 01:52:51.414 CET: Vi1 IPCP: State is Closed 30-11-2006 00:53:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322371: 322312: Nov 30 01:52:51.414 CET: Vi1 IPCP: Remove link info for cef entry 83.233.168.2 30-11-2006 00:53:26 Syslog.Debug 192.168.1.254 322372: 322313: Nov 30 01:52:51.414 CET: Vi1 PPP SSS: Send DISCONNECT to mgr_hdl[DF00004B]

| Now this evening I experienced very fast disconnections. | Nothing better happened. | Do you have a msn contact so we could make some test online?

No.

| Do you think that the problems seems related to policy routing?

The problem is the use of the contact address for the PPTP server's PPP address. I have been able to work around this with policy based routing in 12.2 and 12.3 as I described, but it's always possible that something has changed and this is no longer possible. As PPTP client operation is unsupported the only way you can find out is to turn on debugging for PBR and follow the packets. Unfortunately, I don't know any other solution, so if PBR no longer works in this case you may be out of luck (unless you can get the server to use different addresses for contact point and PPP link).

Dan Lanciani ddl@danlan.*com

. You must not be routing

What do you mean with you dont have be routing through the vpn? I think I have to put dial0 ipnat outside and a nat entry that is like this: ip nat inside source list 102 interface Dialer0 overload

Hello Dan, can you please explain me, or at least pointing me in a cisco doc or similar, to understand every command you gave me, to make further test?

If the policy routing works, what have I to see on the logs?

for example: what is the access list for? what means set int atm0.35 , in policy routing?

ty

In article , snipped-for-privacy@inwind.it (Elia Spadoni) writes: | > 88.233.168.2 is not an address you use for | > | > "initiate-to ip" in the vpdn definition, right? | > | | > | | > | initiate-to ip 83.233.168.2 | > | . You must not be routing | > through the vpn at all. | | What do you mean with you dont have be routing through the vpn?

Any packets sent into the vpn will disappear into a black hole because of the routing loop created by using the same address for the server's end of the PPP link and the initiate-to. That's what is killing the vpn by blocking the keepalives. Since your access to the internet was apparently working you must not have been sending packets out through the vpn.

| I think I have to put dial0 ipnat outside | and a nat entry that is like this: | ip nat inside source list 102 interface Dialer0 overload

But you aren't actually routing any packets to that interface as far as I can see.

| Hello Dan, can you please explain me, or at least pointing me in a cisco | doc or similar, | to understand every command you gave me, to make further test?

Cisco doesn't support client PPTP operation so there is no documentation that I am aware of; however, most of the commands are exactly the same as for any other PPP link. Policy routing commands are reasonably well documented. All you need them to do is force the encapsulated vpn traffic through the real ATM link rather than through the vpn itself, avoiding the loop.

| If the policy routing works, what have I to see on the logs?

PBR debugging is verbose; it can show you how each packet is matched against the route map. You should check that packets for the vpn server are matching and being forced through the ATM link.

| for example: what is the access list for?

It tells the PBR which packets to match.

| what means set int atm0.35 , in policy routing?

It tells the PBR where to send the packets matched by the above access list.

Unfortunately, it seems that it is easier to debug these configurations than to describe how to debug them. :(

Dan Lanciani ddl@danlan.*com

Hi all,

Dan, thanks for this great tutorial, I final got a VPN connection working, but I cannot access that connection, somehow.

I have a Cisco 877 with an integrated DSL modem. There are two VLAN´s configured: VLAN1 (Data): 192.168.1.0 VLAN5 (Voice): 192.168.5.0 No ACL´s configured on both VLAN´s.

Dialer1 is for the DSL connection and Dialer2 for the VPN connection.

Dialer2: interface Dialer2 description PPTP-side Dialer ip address negotiated ip access-group 102 in ip pim dense-mode ip nat outside ip virtual-reassembly encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 0 dialer string 123 dialer vpdn dialer-group 2 no peer neighbor-route no cdp enable ppp pfc local forbid ppp pfc remote reject ppp encrypt mppe auto ppp chap hostname ppp chap password

This is the routing config:

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ip route 212.19.62.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer2 ip route 216.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer2 ip route 216.168.2.17 255.255.255.255 Dialer1

ACL: ip nat inside source list 110 interface Dialer2 overload ip nat inside source list 111 interface Dialer1 overload

access-list 101 permit ip any any access-list 102 permit ip any any access-list 110 deny ip any host 216.168.2.17 access-list 110 permit ip any 216.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 110 permit ip any 212.19.62.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 110 deny ip any any access-list 111 permit ip any host 216.168.2.17 access-list 111 deny ip any 216.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 111 deny ip any 212.19.62.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 111 permit ip any any dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 2 protocol ip permit

Routing table: Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0

216.168.1.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 216.168.1.244 is directly connected, Dialer2 (my dynamic VPN IP) S 212.19.62.0/24 is directly connected, Dialer2 216.168.2.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks S 216.168.2.17/32 is directly connected, Dialer1 S 216.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Dialer2 77.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 77.220.110.80 is directly connected, Dialer1 C 192.168.5.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan5 C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan1 195.16.255.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C is directly connected, Dialer1 S* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Dialer1

NAT is working properly, when I ping an address which should go through dialer2: show ip nat translations | include 212.19.62.76 icmp 216.168.1.244:6658 192.168.1.26:6658 212.19.62.76:6658

212.19.62.76:6658

I don´t get a ping back from that IP address. When I ping the address directly from the cisco everything is working:

ping 212.19.62.76

Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 212.19.62.76, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 380/382/384 ms

The connection is up and running and I don´t get the same IP address that is configured in the VPDN initate-to IP configuration.

Somebody got a hint for this problem? Thanks!

I configure cisco router as PPTP client.

In router everything is ok (ping 8.8.8.8 is ok) But I can not ping 8.8.8.8 from pc. (ping 8.8.8.8 -----> Request timed out.)

show interfaces dialer 0

---->Internet address is 172.16.3.37/32

Plaese HELP ME

----------------------------------------------------- (router to pptp server): interface gig 0/0/0 ip address 10.96.174.225 255.255.254.0 no sh

(router to pc): interface Gig 0/1 ip nat inside ip address 172.21.2.1 255.255.255.0 no sh

(Pc):

172.21.2.2 255.255.255.0 172.21.2.1

------------------------------------------------------

Router :

service internal vpdn enable

vpdn-group 1 request-dialin protocol pptp pool-member 1 initiate-to ip 31.24.238.222 ex

interface Dialer0 ip address negotiated encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 dialer idle-timeout 0 dialer string 123 dialer vpdn dialer persistent ppp chap hostname pptphostname ppp chap password 0 pptppassword ip nat outside ex

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 ip route 31.24.238.222 255.255.255.255 10.96.174.1

dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ip nat inside source list 100 interface dialer 0 overload access-list 100 permit ip any any

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Router Config:

Router2921#show running-config

version 15.2 service config service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec service password-encryption service internal

! no aaa new-model ! ip cef !

no ipv6 cef multilink bundle-name authenticated ! vpdn enable ! vpdn-group 1 request-dialin protocol pptp pool-member 1 initiate-to ip 31.24.238.222 ! ! ! ! license udi pid CISCO2921/K9 sn FGL172711NU hw-module sm 1 !

! interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 no ip address shutdown ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0

! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip address 172.21.2.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly in duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 ip address 10.96.175.30 255.255.254.0 ip virtual-reassembly in ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1/0

! interface GigabitEthernet1/0 no ip address shutdown ! interface GigabitEthernet1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module no ip address ! interface Vlan1 no ip address ! interface Dialer1 ip address negotiated ip access-group 101 in ip access-group 101 out ip nat outside ip virtual-reassembly in encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer remote-name david dialer idle-timeout 0 dialer string 1234 dialer persistent dialer vpdn dialer-group 1 ppp pfc local request ppp pfc remote apply ppp eap refuse ppp chap hostname pptpusername ppp chap password pptppassword ppp ms-chap refuse ppp pap refuse no cdp enable ! ! ip forward-protocol nd ! no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ip nat inside source list 100 interface Dialer1 overload ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ip route 31.24.238.0 255.255.255.0 10.96.174.1 ! access-list 100 permit ip any any access-list 101 permit ip any any dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Router2921#show ip nat translations Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside global icmp 172.16.3.234:1 172.21.2.2:1 4.2.2.4:1 4.2.2.4:1 udp 172.16.3.234:51517 172.21.2.2:51517 4.2.2.4:53 4.2.2.4:53 udp 172.16.3.234:52168 172.21.2.2:52168 4.2.2.4:53 4.2.2.4:53 udp 172.16.3.234:52579 172.21.2.2:52579 4.2.2.4:53 4.2.2.4:53 tcp 172.16.3.234:58283 172.21.2.2:58283 2.22.144.112:80 2.22.144.112:80

I configure cisco router as PPTP client.

In router everything is ok (ping 8.8.8.8 is ok) But I can not ping 8.8.8.8 from pc. (ping 8.8.8.8 -----> Request timed out.)

show interfaces dialer 0

---->Internet address is 172.16.3.37/32

Plaese HELP ME

----------------------------------------------------- (router to pptp server): interface gig 0/0/0 ip address 10.96.174.225 255.255.254.0 no sh

(router to pc): interface Gig 0/1 ip nat inside ip address 172.21.2.1 255.255.255.0 no sh

(Pc):

172.21.2.2 255.255.255.0 172.21.2.1

------------------------------------------------------

Router :

service internal vpdn enable

vpdn-group 1 request-dialin protocol pptp pool-member 1 initiate-to ip 31.24.238.222 ex

interface Dialer0 ip address negotiated encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 dialer idle-timeout 0 dialer string 123 dialer vpdn dialer persistent ppp chap hostname pptphostname ppp chap password 0 pptppassword ip nat outside ex

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 ip route 31.24.238.222 255.255.255.255 10.96.174.1

dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ip nat inside source list 100 interface dialer 0 overload access-list 100 permit ip any any

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Router Config:

Router2921#show running-config

version 15.2 service config service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec service password-encryption service internal

! no aaa new-model ! ip cef !

no ipv6 cef multilink bundle-name authenticated ! vpdn enable ! vpdn-group 1 request-dialin protocol pptp pool-member 1 initiate-to ip 31.24.238.222 ! ! ! ! license udi pid CISCO2921/K9 sn FGL172711NU hw-module sm 1 !

! interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 no ip address shutdown ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0

! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip address 172.21.2.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly in duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 ip address 10.96.175.30 255.255.254.0 ip virtual-reassembly in ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1/0

! interface GigabitEthernet1/0 no ip address shutdown ! interface GigabitEthernet1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module no ip address ! interface Vlan1 no ip address ! interface Dialer1 ip address negotiated ip access-group 101 in ip access-group 101 out ip nat outside ip virtual-reassembly in encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer remote-name david dialer idle-timeout 0 dialer string 1234 dialer persistent dialer vpdn dialer-group 1 ppp pfc local request ppp pfc remote apply ppp eap refuse ppp chap hostname pptpusername ppp chap password pptppassword ppp ms-chap refuse ppp pap refuse no cdp enable ! ! ip forward-protocol nd ! no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ip nat inside source list 100 interface Dialer1 overload ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ip route 31.24.238.0 255.255.255.0 10.96.174.1 ! access-list 100 permit ip any any access-list 101 permit ip any any dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Router2921#show ip nat translations Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside global icmp 172.16.3.234:1 172.21.2.2:1 4.2.2.4:1 4.2.2.4:1 udp 172.16.3.234:51517 172.21.2.2:51517 4.2.2.4:53 4.2.2.4:53 udp 172.16.3.234:52168 172.21.2.2:52168 4.2.2.4:53 4.2.2.4:53 udp 172.16.3.234:52579 172.21.2.2:52579 4.2.2.4:53 4.2.2.4:53 tcp 172.16.3.234:58283 172.21.2.2:58283 2.22.144.112:80 2.22.144.112:80

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required