Bandwidth limiting per host

Hey there,

That's kind of right, but you could tweak it a bit better. With rate-limiting you are giving 128k bandwidth with 16k burst each time period, effectively giving 256k. Which is probably why you don't think it's working.

It would make more sense to build it this way, using the mcq:-

--------

access-list 10 permit host w.x.y.z

class-map match-any SpecificHost match access-group 10

policy-map SqueezeHost class SpecificHost police 128

interface e0/0 service-policy input SqueezeHost service-policy output SqueezeHost

--------

This way your chap will only get 128k tops. I would use a standard access-list if you are specifying a single host. If you want to use an extended, then make sure that you catch both to and from traffic.

Enjoy

LH CCIE#15331

snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote:

One minor typo:

... should read "mqc", not "mcq". MQC stands for "Modular QoS CLI".

Also, I suspect everyone will be happier if you _shape_ the victim host to

Bruce Lueckenhoff

-- snipped-for-privacy@ScalableDesign.com

Good calls Bruce

snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote:

Hi, Thanks for the reply.

But its still not working that way also. When I measure the bandwidth from x.x.x.x(client pc) its shows very high download spead. The network is like this:

x.x.x.x------------------->Cisco router( where this is done)----->Backbone router---->Serial link.

Cisco Router got single ethernet card and its gw has been set as the IP address of "Backbone Router".

Please suggest. I want to limit each and every user passing that Cisco router.

regards baruah

Leigh wrote:

Hey there,

What kind of download speeds are you getting? 128k bandwidth is not too slow a link for a single user.

Could you post the bits of config that you have put on ?

LH CCIE#15331

snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote: