1. Home
  2. Cisco Systems
  3. 6500 traffic forward

6500 traffic forward

Hello,

I have a question about routing on 6500 catalyst switch. How I can forward all traffic to transparent device which I can control band

Default gateway ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.1

6500 switch with 5 vlan`s and ATM interface (internet connection)

--- ---- ----- ------------------------- ------------------- ---

--------

1 1 2 1000BaseX Supervisor WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE yes ok 15 1 1 Multilayer Switch Feature WS-F6K-MSFC2 no ok 4 4 16 1000BaseX Ethernet WS-X6416-GBIC no ok 6 6 0 FlexWAN Module WS-X6182-2PA no ok 8 8 48 10/100BaseTX Ethernet WS-X6248-RJ-45 no ok

interface ATM6/0/0 no ip address atm sonet stm-1 no atm auto-configuration no atm ilmi-keepalive no atm address-registration no atm ilmi-enable ! interface ATM6/0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.252 pvc 1/101 vbr-nrt 114000 114000 1 encapsulation aal5snap ! ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.10.64.1 255.255.255.192 ip helper-address 10.10.64.4 ! interface Vlan11 ip address 10.10.64.65 255.255.255.192 ip helper-address 10.10.64.4 ! interface Vlan12 ip address 10.10.78.1 255.255.255.128 ip helper-address 10.10.64.4 ! interface Vlan13 ip address 10.10.64.193 255.255.255.192 ip helper-address 10.10.64.4 ! interface Vlan14 ip address 10.10.65.1 255.255.255.192 ip helper-address 10.10.64.4

thanks for help

Reply to
ufik
Loading thread data ...

Put it inline between you and the Wide Area Network or your next hop. Be next to impossible to do it for LAN traffic if you have redundant cores. I doubt a static will work unless the device will actually route traffic.

Reply to
Trendkill

I can`t put this device between me and ISP I must doing something like this LAN (10 subnets) ->TRANSPARENT DEVICE -> ATM interfce -> ISP

Reply to
ufik

Eek.....guess you don't have another routing you can toss in between and make it pass-through. If it doesn't route, there is no way to point traffic at it and let it route back to the core as once it gets back to the core, itll just take the same path over again. Hmm...I'll see what me and some fellow engineers can think of..

Reply to
Trendkill

the ATM interface is probably the choke point.

maybe you can run 2 copies of routing on the box using VRFs?

run 1 copy locally, take the traffic to the WAN out via a GigE and back into a separate GigE then route to ATM.

you may need a more expensive feature set to support this.......

the big drawback is you will send every WAN packet thru your Cat twice, so using up CPU performance, although the PFC should handle the extra load.

>
Reply to
stephen

I am read about VRF but I never yet do it. Could you write me a sample.

Reply to
ufik

connection)

the marketing spin on this:

formatting link
this should get you started with what you are doing
formatting link
i have only done this on other platforms - i suggest you pull the config guide from cisco.com for the IOS you are using.

note - all you are using these MPLS related features for is to let you split the ports across 2 logical routers inside 1 box. you dont need any of the MPLS label switching complications.

finally - dont do this on a live box without booking some downtime, saving your current config and working out a backout plan....

>
Reply to
stephen

Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.